Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Editorial News
Classified Sites


Manitoba continues to push for abolition of Senate after Ottawa's quick fix fails

Justice  Minister Andrew Swan


Justice Minister Andrew Swan

Manitoba has renewed its quest to see the Canadian Senate abolished in light of a Supreme Court decision Friday that dashed federal hopes for a quick fix for the institution.

"Our view on the need to abolish the Senate has not wavered, and if anything it is stronger in light of the Supreme Court’s decision this morning," Attorney General Andrew Swan said.

"I believe Brad Wall, the premier of Saskatchewan, said it best. He said it would be difficult to abolish the Senate. It would be impossible to reform it," Swan said at the close of a news conference in which he announced the province would hire 10 more Crown attorneys and fund a beefed-up police civilian unit that works with prosecutors.

In a historic, unanimous decision, the top court advised that Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s proposals to impose term limits on senators and create a "consultative election" process to choose nominees cannot be done by the federal government alone.

Rather, the court said such reforms would require constitutional amendments, approved by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population — a route fraught with political landmines which Harper had hoped to avoid.

Moreover, the court set the bar even higher for abolishing the Senate, something Harper has threatened to do if his reform agenda is stymied. Getting rid of the chamber altogether would require the unanimous consent of all 10 provinces, the eight justices said.

"The Supreme Court has said very clearly that when we’re looking at fundamental change — at abolishing or reforming the Senate — it’s not the unilateral decision of Parliament," Swan said. "Canada is a federation, it’s a partnership and it’s necessary for the federal government to consult with and work with the provinces."

Swan said Manitoba has been clear in its position that the Senate has outlived its usefulness. He referred to the institution as "the biggest taxpayer subsidy — to some political parties in Canada — a reference to the fact that the Upper Chamber is filled with Conservatives and Liberals.

He urged the federal government to call the provinces together for a constitutional conference so "we can have a good discussion on how we get rid of an outmoded institution."

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 4 out of 5 (1 votes).
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 1 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Canadians should be careful about getting rid of something that has a purpose and role in protecting Canada and Canadians from the "Democratic element".Regardless of the colour of the stripe that one might wear or represent,I believe we still need a senate, so before anyone goes ahead to actually make the abolishing of the senate a reality, it might be prudent to do some background research to investigate "Why the senate was established in the first place".The senate was created under the Constitution Act, in 1867, primarily to protect regional interests, but also to provide what George-Etienne Cartier called a "power of resistance to oppose the democratic element" Hence the senate,in Canada,is based on the House of Lords concept in England, and was explicitly designed to check the actions of parliament ( the democratic element). In this regard, the biggest nightmare scenario was: the democratic election of a government that would nationalize resources. redistribute income, property, Yes, it is time to make a change, not to abolish the senate, but revamp what Canadians need and must have…. for protection. Who or what will take the place of what Manitoba is pushing to abolish? That is the question and that question needs an answer. Justice Minister Swan , we await your answer. You have two remaining life lines to help you. I suggest you use them to better your knowledge and seriously ponder about your irrational commitment.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun - Readers Choice Results
Why Not Minot?

Social Media