Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Editorial News
Classified Sites


PUB hears arguments against Hydro rate increase

Manitoba’s Public Utilities Board should reject Manitoba Hydro’s request for a 3.5 per cent rate request because it’s too rich for today’s times.

The three-member PUB panel was also told today that the Crown Utility should put more effort into a robust energy efficiency program to get Manitobans to cut back on their power consumption so that more electricity can be shipped to the United States for sale.

The Green Action Centre, Manitoba Branch of the Canadian Consumers’ Association of Canada and the Manitoba Industrial Power Users Group (MIPUG) each made presentations today. Final arguments continue Wednesday.

Hydro presentation

 Read Manitoba Hydro's presentation to the Public Utilities Board about the increase (1.22 MB .PDF)


Manitoba Hydro wants the PUB to approve the 3.5 per cent general rate increase effective April 1 to put more money into its back account ($197 million) as it prepares to build the $3.820 billion Bipole III transmission line — an environmental hearing for the project resumes March 4 — and the Keeyask and Conapawa generating stations, estimated to cost $6.220 billion and $10.192 billion respectively.

Manitoba Hydro is also asking for final approval of earlier interim increases approved by the PUB, including a two per cent increase effective April 1, 2012 and a 2.5 per cent increase effective Sept. 1, 2012.

Hydro says even with the increase and past increases over the past year, totaling 5.5 per cent, Manitobans pay the lowest for power in North America.

Included in Hydro’s request is for the PUB to release a $23-million pot of money that was created when the PUB ordered a one per cent rate claw back two years ago.

Manitoba Branch of the Canadian Consumers’ Association of Canada says that money rightfully belongs to rate payers and should be rebated. It also said Manitoba Hydro could also apply to have a portion of that money, but only if it uses it towards improving its energy efficiency programs.

The consumers’ association also says Hydro has not made a strong enough case for the 3.5 per cent increase, especially at a time when its retained earnings sit at a record $2.510 billion.

The Green Action Centre, on the other hand, supports the 3.5 per cent increase because of the recent hit the utility has taken on the export market and lower forecasted surplus power sales.

On Friday, Hydro released its third quarter results which showed it had a posted a net loss of $38 million for the first nine months of the fiscal year. Last year, it earned profits of $29 million during the same period.

The Green Action Centre also said it supported a $41-million annual expenditure by Hydro over the next three years to support its efficiency programs.

That might not be a bad idea.

A recent report by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy found spending on energy efficiency upgrades puts more money into the economy than building new infrastructure for energy production.

MIPUG, which represents the biggest industrial consumers of electricity in the province, told the PUB it should reject the 3.5 per cent rate increase request as Hydro had not justified its need for the money above the total 5.5 per cent increase the PUB has already approved under the earlier rate requests made by Hydro.

It also called on the PUB to refund or credit to customers the $23 million sitting in a deferral account under the one per cent rate rollback.

"The 5.5 per cent increase over two years exceeds inflation, which is problematic for customers, but does lead to a predictable transition to the higher rates that may ultimately be required over the coming decade," MIPUG said in its submission.

At the beginning of Hydro’s 3.5 per cent rate application, it signaled that it wants increases of 3.95 per cent in each of the remaining 18 years of its 20-year financial forecast.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

2017 Brandon Sun Community Leader Awards
Brandon Sun - Readers Choice Results
Why Not Minot?

Social Media