Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Editorial News
Classified Sites


Arguments heard for, against Hydro rate hike

Manitoba's Public Utilities Board was told Monday it should reject Manitoba Hydro's request for a 3.5 per cent rate hike because the Crown utility hasn't made a convincing case it needs the extra money.

The three-member PUB panel also heard Hydro should put more resources into its energy-conservation programs so more Manitobans will cut back their power consumption, allowing more excess electricity to be sold to the United States.

Gloria Desorcy, executive director of the Manitoba branch of the Consumers' Association of Canada, said Hydro has already secured two interim increases from the PUB this year totalling 5.5 per cent, and an additional 3.5 per cent increase effective April 1 is too much for Manitobans to pay.

"Are they looking internally, which is what I believe other companies do to see if they can cut their costs, before they turn to their customers to look for a rate increase?" Desorcy said. The consumers' association, the Green Action Centre and the Manitoba Industrial Power Users Group (MIPUG) each made their final arguments to the PUB on Monday. Final arguments continue Wednesday.

Manitoba Hydro wants the PUB to approve the 3.5 per cent general rate increase to put more money into its bank account ($197 million) as it prepares to build the $3.820-billion Bipole III transmission line -- an environmental hearing for the project resumes March 4 -- and the Keeyask and Conapawa generating stations, estimated to cost $6.220 billion and $10.192 billion, respectively.

Manitoba Hydro is also seeking final approval of the earlier interim increases approved by the PUB, including a two per cent increase effective April 1, 2012 and a 2.5 per cent increase effective Sept. 1, 2012.

Hydro says even with those increases combined, Manitobans pay the lowest for power in North America.

Included in Hydro's request is for the PUB to release a $23-million pot of money that was created when the PUB ordered a one per cent rate clawback two years ago.

The consumers' association said that money rightfully belongs to ratepayers and should be rebated. It also said Manitoba Hydro could apply to have a portion of that money, but only if it uses it toward improving its energy-efficiency programs. The association also said Hydro has not made a strong enough case for the 3.5 per cent increase, especially at a time when its retained earnings sit at a record $2.510 billion.

The Green Action Centre, on the other hand, supports the 3.5 per cent increase because of the recent hit the utility has taken on the export market and lower forecasted surplus power sales.

Last Friday, Hydro released its third-quarter results, which showed it posted a net loss of $38 million for the first nine months of the fiscal year. Last year, it earned profits of $29 million during the same period.

The Green Action Centre also said it supports a $41-million annual expenditure by Hydro over the next three years to support its energy-efficiency programs, such as more aggressive home insulation and light bulb-replacement programs.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 1 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

My opinion is that the NDP gov't is skimming money off hydro for their purposes. We don't need BiPole 111, as we seem to be having a problem selling what we have to states for any amount of money.

Any green energy is subsidized by the taxpayer so why even bother with that!!! Solar panels and windmill look ugly on the landscape!!!

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun - Readers Choice Results
Why Not Minot?

Social Media