Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Editorial News
Classified Sites


Bears, whales and crude oil don't mix


The first warden of Wapusk National Park near Churchill says an oil spill along Manitoba's northern rail line could be "horrendous" for polar bears.

Doug Clark, now a professor in the University of Saskatchewan's School of Environment and Sustainability, said the Hudson Bay Railway crosses the Owl and Broad rivers, the heart of the polar bear denning area in Manitoba. A derailment and spill anywhere in that large region, where the mushy permafrost already wreaks havoc on the rail line, would be disastrous for polar bears, said Clark.

Polar bears are curious and are drawn to anything oily and plastic, and will likely come in contact with any spill.

Clark, who lived in Churchill for three years and still studies polar bears and environmental change, pointed to a controversial and seminal 1980 study by a Norwegian scientist who dunked four Churchill polar bears in a briny, oily solution to test the effects of crude oil on the bears' physiology. Most of the bears died "really fast and really badly," said Clark.

"When it comes to polar bear populations, (shipping oil by rail) is probably one of the most dangerous things that could ever be considered," said Clark. "Crude oil is horrendously toxic to polar bears. I don't mind using the word horrendous, because it is."

A spill closer to the port could also be devastating to beluga whales that congregate every summer in the Churchill River's estuary. There, warm water and fish abound, and tourists visit by the thousands to catch a glimpse of the whales.

Gasoline, diesel and other light petroleum products are already shipped by rail to the port. But Clark says Omnitrax's plan to begin shipping crude oil amounts to a huge increase in the amount of petroleum products on the line.

And, crude oil is far more difficult to clean up, especially in the vast, shallow sponge that is permafrost.

"It gets into the system, it sinks and it stays," he said.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 4 out of 5 (1 votes).
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 1 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Do you think this will put Omnitrax or Harpers government in a rethinking mode, and at least, try to recognize the wisdom of the Precautionary Principle? Is the Federal Environment minister going to come to the defence of the bears, whales and environment? Probably NOT! (If she does, she's out of a job)

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

2017 Brandon Sun Community Leader Awards
Brandon Sun - Readers Choice Results
Why Not Minot?

Social Media