Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Editorial News
Classified Sites

Brandon Sun - ONLINE EDITION

Hydro chooses route for new power line

West-side choice evokes more controversy

Proposed route

Enlarge Image

Proposed route (HANDOUT)

MANITOBA Hydro chose a route Thursday for its massive new power line, but already some First Nations -- and even a few rural politicians -- are balking at the $2.2-billion project.

Southern Grand Chief Morris Swan Shannacappo was en route Thursday to Winnipeg for an emergency chiefs meeting to discuss the new route down the west side of the province to Winnipeg.

At least three First Nations -- Long Plain, Dakota Plains and Sandy Bay -- have already hired a lawyer to fight Bipole III unless they are properly consulted and compensated for impacts on their traditional land.

"No one has set foot in my band office yet to talk about this," said Sandy Bay Chief Russel Beaulieu. "We have our lawyers lined up."

Shannacappo said Hydro has made billions of dollars over the years on land belonging to First Nations. Until an environmental audit is done on the impact Hydro has had on southern bands, Shannacappo said, the chiefs won't negotiate on the power line.

That could mire the NDP government in exactly the kind of quicksand it was hoping to avoid when it forced Manitoba Hydro to abandon a plan to build down the pristine east side of Lake Winnipeg in favour of the more developed western edge of the province.

"What this does is illustrate that no matter what side you build on, you'll have hurdles," said Tory Leader Hugh McFadyen, whose party has hammered the NDP on the extra cost and length of the west side route.

After months of public meetings on three possible routes, Hydro announced Thursday it had settled on one that runs from the dams in northeastern Manitoba, south of Thompson and The Pas, to the east of the Porcupine Forest Reserve and Duck Mountain Provincial Park and then along the western shores of Lake Manitoba. Near the town of St. Claude, it takes a sharp turn east and runs south of Niverville to Winnipeg's east side. Hydro says it's the shortest route with the least impact on agriculture. About a third of the 1,350-kilometre route will tower over private land.

Hydro is now beginning negotiations with 1,000 farmers and ranchers over compensation. With a property acquisition budget of $37 million, Hydro will be offering as much as 135 per cent of the assessed value of each 66-metre-wide parcel upon which the towers will be built.

Besides landowners and 15 First Nations, Hydro will also need to lobby 18 rural municipalities and nine towns for their support.

At least three RMs -- Grey, Macdonald southwest of Winnipeg and Westbourne on the southwestern tip of Lake Manitoba -- have already passed resolutions opposing the power line through their municipalities.

Westbourne Reeve David Single said the power lines will be a nuisance to farmers forced to seed and plow around them.

More than that, the RM is worried about the cost to Manitobans, the power lost on a longer line and the impact on productive land on the west side.

"It's just stupid, really," said Single.

"It should go down the east side, not the west side."

The route is about 500 kilometres longer and hundreds of millions of dollars more expensive than the original route down the east side of Lake Winnipeg, where the province plans to turn the untouched boreal forest into a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Several bands on the east side are firmly opposed to a power line through their traditional lands.

Building there would likely spawn a huge political and legal battle and the wrath of American environmentalists already skeptical of Hydro's clean power.

Finance Minister Rosann Wowchuk said the line is vital to the reliability of Manitoba's power supply and to exports, which could generate billions in revenue.

The challenges on the east side and the benefits of a globally recognized boreal forest outweigh any hurdles on the west side, she said.

Hydro spokesman Glenn Schneider said the company has tried repeatedly to contact and meet with bands on the west side and will try again now that a route has been chosen.

maryagnes.welch@freepress.mb.ca

Power line timeline

August -- Public consultations on the chosen route, with open houses and community meetings to be announced.

Early 2011 -- Exact route finalized.

June, 2011 -- Environmental impact assessment submitted for approval and licensing.

Fall 2012 -- Construction starts

Mid-2017 -- In service

 

Green fears

The power line avoids big provincial parks, and most environmentalists are pleased with the route. But there are a couple of lingering worries.

Caribou: The route runs through a couple of known ranges belonging to probably the most majestic threatened species in Manitoba's hinterland. Hydro has specifically avoided areas around the Wuskwatim dam where caribou are known to linger, and more data is being collected to make sure the herds are bypassed as much as possible.

Skinks and butterflies: Two species with critical habitats along the route, including little lizards called skinks, need watching. Hydro thinks it can mitigate any damage to habitats by protecting vegetation or planting new.

The Saskatchewan River Delta: The Wilderness Committee is eyeballing the lowland grass plains and bogs near The Pas, which it calls a conservation hot spot known as a key migratory bird breeding and staging area.

Tom Lamb Provincial Wildlife Management Area: Located near The Pas, it's a big breeding and staging area for waterfowl and a habitat for moose, wolves, beavers and black bears. The line bisects its western corner.

 

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

17 Commentscomment icon

The road and the hydro line don't have to run beside each other but they could be tied together for negotiation purposes.

@equality_for_all

"If Aboriginals want a road and we want a power line then build an all-weather road along the power line with the understanding that Aboriginals DO NOT get compensation if a the all-weather road is built ... period ...."

First of all, a road winds to connect communities. BiPole III will run in straight lines. Secondly, since the compensation they'd be seeking has nothing to do with road access, no cigar.

Norm: "Whine whine whine, that's all I hear here. You all MAKE ME SICK. Just come out and admit your political bias and be done with it, it doesn't matter which route was chosen, you idiots complain about it regardless because it's an NDP government in power! [edited]"

Gee, and that was the part of your comment that they'd print. Way to argue based on the issues.

It's not a bias against the NDP per se, it's a bias against stupidity. If a couple of billion is chump change to you, would you mind? I'm a little short til payday.

Here is a thought....

Aboriginals want an all-weather road on the east side of Lake Winnipeg to connect their remote communities while we want to build a power line on the same side.

If Aboriginals want a road and we want a power line then build an all-weather road along the power line with the understanding that Aboriginals DO NOT get compensation if a the all-weather road is built ... period ....

Whine whine whine, that's all I hear here. You all MAKE ME SICK. Just come out and admit your political bias and be done with it, it doesn't matter which route was chosen, you idiots complain about it regardless because it's an NDP government in power! [edited]

The Answer is Always Right: It would be better if there was no plan. Then someone with a couple of brain cells to rub together could put something together that makes a little more sense.

way to go NO DAMN PLAN party and hydro, spending money you don't need to, many other ways to do this, for a lot less money. And you will lose 300 million in sales a year in drop off thanks to this route. No wonder hydro can't make any real money with this stupidity. Time for a change in government and the management at hydro. Since the NO DAMN PLAN party got into power, Manitoba and hydro have both gone backwards. Both are useless.

Ditto to all the other comments. Government - open your eyes - you are looking incredibly foolish!!! I also note that consultations with local land owners are to be held this fall - do you know what time of year this is for many of those land-owners? It's harvest time!!!! - the most critical time of the year for those farmers impacted to earn their hard-earned dollars. But Ms. Wowchuk does know that and that is probably part of the master plan to limit negative feedback - they won't have time to attend!!!


So we're spending an extra 1.5 billion to get held up by a different bunch of people. Why not offer the $1.5B to the people on the east side and be done with it. We'll still be further ahead, we might even get somewhere soon.

So, big surprise. There are people on the west side route with their hands out too, threatening to block the deal. Wasn't this route supposed to be problem free?

The NDP has finally flipped.Those who heat their houses with hydro are going to be paying a high price for Doer's legacy, What a crock.

Hydro chose the route a long time ago, so why the big announcement. There has been a large cut through the forest with towers already erected for months now.[edited]

See - now the First Nations on this side are going to sue. So the longer route makes zero sense. It's all to appease socialists in the UN for that useless UNESCO status. bye bye NDP

"The challenges on the east side and the benefits of a globally recognized boreal forest outweigh any hurdles on the west side, she said."

Instead of worrying about what Guido in Salzburg thinks about Manitoban forests, how about doing Manitobans a favor and building for economic reasons rather than political ones? The NDP indulged FNs in the fiction of traditional land and now Bands routinely use that fiction to claim compensation. It's all traditional land above the 52nd parallel, acording to the NDP, so no matter where they go with Bipole III they get stuck with bogus claims (except if the line goes underwater down Lake Winnipeg).

This is a misleading headline. Hydro didn't choose this route, the Premier did.

Why hold public consultations when the Doer/Selinger crowd have already decided the far more costly route? And the only reason is to protect the 'chance' to have the boreal forest declared a world heritage site by Unesco. Who really gives a damn about Unesco and World Heritage Sites when we are talking hundreds of millions of dollars more cost for the west route.
The Province has already committed to all-weather roads up the east side to give isolated First Nations communities access to cheaper goods, medical attention etc., so why not build the Bipole system at the same time and save the overburdened Manitoba taxpayer some cash. Negotiate with First Nations on the east side and share the wealth that this Province has been bragging about for decades. The west route will keep Manitoba standing in the bread line looking for more equalization payments from our forward-seeing provinces. The Unesco site will be or it won't but the tab for this will be felt for generations. I can already see my power bill jumping. The World Heritage Site fiasco already smells like the NDP is trying to enhance its "Legacy".
I am disgusted by this decision and disgusted by the free-spending NDP governments that this province has elected so often. Time for a change people, time to elect a party that will try to save money rather than stand in line for more handouts.

Boreal...my @$$, they only fear the negotiations with the First Nations along the east side route. They are already mired in such issues building the new promised road up the east side of Lake Winnipeg.

Consider just for a moment...if they bring the line down the East side of Lake Winnipeg Hydro needs to build a service road for their lines...

Don't know about you, but this appears to resolve two issues....road and power, which is a win win situation...

So, why are we going to the West????

"A major factor was the protection of a proposed UNESCO World Heritage site in that area."

The NDP may have heard of another UNESCO World Heritage site that also contains thousands of square kilometres of vast forest, mountains, rivers, lakes and wetlands.

Banff and Jasper National parks are a UNESCO World Heritage site with their thousands of hotel rooms, restaurants, condos, houses, highways, roads, powerlines, sewers, etc..

Save the Manitoban taxpayers over $1.5 billion and stop this nonsense to build the powerline on the west side of Lake Winnipeg because this decision is based on a bogus UNESCO World Heritage site argument made by our government !!!

The comment period for this story has expired and the we are no longer accepting comments on this story.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Ads by Google