Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Editorial News
Classified Sites

Brandon Sun - ONLINE EDITION

Keep politics out of judges' pay: lawyer

A lawyer representing provincial court judges asked a legislative committee Tuesday to guard against making judicial pay a political issue.

Susan Dawes, counsel for the Provincial Judges Association of Manitoba, argued legislators should accept the recommendations of the impartial Judicial Compensation Committee (JCC).

In July, it recommended provincial court judges' pay increases in 2012 and 2013 be based on the annual percentage increase in average weekly earnings in Manitoba for the previous calendar year.

For 2011, the JCC set a base pay of $218,000, an increase of 2.9 per cent over the previous year. That pay increase was binding under Manitoba law because it kept judges' salaries here below the average in three prescribed provinces (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan).

Under the JCC formula, Manitoba provincial judges would see their pay climb by 2.77 per cent, effective April 1, 2012. Wage data are not available yet to calculate judges' pay effective April 1, 2013.

The 2.77 per cent increase the JCC recommended for 2012 would boost provincial court judges' salaries to $224,039. The new rate is subject to approval by the Manitoba legislature because it's slightly higher than the benchmark three-province average, although still well below the average for all provinces.

In a submission to the JCC, the province had recommended pay increases of 0, 0 and 2.9 per cent for the years 2011-2013 -- in line with offers to public servants.

Dawes, the lawyer representing provincial court judges, said the three-member JCC took into account the province's financial plight in making its unanimous recommendation.

"At the end of the day, we're talking about 40 or 41 judges," she told MLAs from all three parties Tuesday. "Any variance to these recommendations is not going to impact the province's bottom line."

The legislative committee did not make a decision on Tuesday. It said it would reconvene at a later date.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Why Not Minot?
Brandon Sun Business Directory
Brandon Sun Twitter