Latest News

Brandon Sun - ONLINE EDITION

Métis ready for another court battle

Dispute over transmission line

By: Larry Kusch

Tuesday, Mar. 12, 2013 at 9:52 AM | Comments: 3

Manitoba Metis Federation president David Chartrand accused Manitoba Hydro of refusing to consult with Métis people over the construction of the Bipole III transmission line. (JESSICA BURTNICK/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

Fresh off a major victory in the Supreme Court of Canada, the Manitoba Metis Federation threatened Monday to use legal means to halt construction of a major hydro transmission line in Manitoba.

MMF president David Chartrand accused Manitoba Hydro of refusing to consult with the Métis people on the construction of the $3.28-billion Bipole III transmission line.

He said the Crown corporation appeared complacent and was acting as though it was inevitable the Clean Environment Commission would give the huge project its stamp of approval.

"We're just the casualties of war," Chartrand complained to the CEC.

He implored the commission to refuse to grant Hydro an environmental licence to build the 1,400-kilometre line -- linking northern dams to the south -- until the corporation comes to the table.

Chartrand said the proposed line would cause "immense damage" to Métis people by disrupting such important cultural and economic activities as hunting, gathering and trapping.

"Without question, if this thing moves ahead, you will see me in the courtroom. And I do not want to go to court," he said during a 90-minute appearance before the commission, adding he is weary of court battles.

"But if Hydro continues to just ignore my people and disrespect them, we will fight to the end. We will protect our people."

On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled Ottawa did not live up to its obligations after it promised to set aside certain lands for Métis children at the time Manitoba joined confederation.

The MMF believes the ruling strengthens its case to be properly consulted -- and compensated -- by Hydro in the construction of the transmission line.

Chartrand accused the Crown corporation of having "tunnel vision," saying it seemed Hydro was content to consult a handful of Métis individuals and communities while ignoring the group that speaks for all of them.

He said he was under the impression when he appeared before the CEC in November that Manitoba Hydro intended to have a serious discussion with the MMF over Bipole. He said that never happened.

On Monday, Chartrand sparred with Hydro lawyer Douglas Bedford, who questioned whether the MMF spoke for all of Manitoba's Métis people.

He noted that in an earlier submission, the MMF had said it represented 40,000 people when Statistics Canada says there are 90,000 persons of Métis descent in the province.

Chartrand bristled at the suggestion he did not represent the Métis. He apologized if an old population figure got into a previous affidavit for the CEC. He said the MMF has 55,000 adult members. The organization does include children in its membership counts.

Chartrand told Bedford that given his line of questioning, he now understood why Hydro had refused to consult meaningfully with his organization.

Bill Henderson, a Hydro spokesman, said later there have been "extensive attempts" by Hydro to consult with the Métis people -- with the grassroots as well as leaders.

"We've made major efforts to work with them and to engage and to solicit input that reflects their interests and we will continue to do so," Henderson said. "I think that Manitoba Hydro would dispute very much that we have not been trying to work diligently with the MMF."

Chartrand said he supports Manitoba Hydro as an important economic generator for the province and believes an arrangement can be worked out with the corporation on Bipole.

While the MMF leader said his people would seek compensation for the construction of the line, he insisted money was secondary to the need to address outstanding environmental concerns. larry.kusch@freepress.mb.ca

Rate this
This article is currently rated an average of 4 out of 5 (1 votes).

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 3 Comments

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Posted by:Free Thinker

March 12, 2013 at 1:49 PM

The bi-pole 3 route down the west side of Lake Winnipeg should never be approved for a variety of common sense reasons, least of which are trapping, hunting, etc. Mr. Chartrand is merely in it for the money.

Posted by:manitobametis

March 12, 2013 at 12:51 PM

would you like some wine and cheese with that?

Posted by:JOHN FEFCHAK

March 12, 2013 at 8:19 AM

First Nations have their Chief and sub Chiefs speaking and looking out for themselves.
(MMF) Manitoba Metis Federation have their presidents and leaders speaking out for themselves. WHO is speaking out for the rest of Canada's' people ? The rest of us, whose parents and grandparents immigrated to this country, Canada, to work and raise families and help build and make this country a great and United Nation.
What has happened? We are becoming splintered into groups and tribes, that only seem interested in going to the courts to get their piece of Manitoba,(and Canada) because certain consultations did not include their representation.
What the He** is happening to OUR Canada?.

Post Your Comment

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.