Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Editorial News
Classified Sites


Province coy on timetable for Keeyask hydro plan

Keeyask Dam Hydro-Electric Generating station.

Enlarge Image

Keeyask Dam Hydro-Electric Generating station.

The province is keeping its cards close to its vest on a timetable for formally approving the proposed $6.5-billion Keeyask hydro generating station.

Conservation and Water Stewardship Minister Gord Mackintosh said he will await the outcome of two more consultation processes before he decides whether to issue an environmental licence.

The Manitoba Clean Environment Commission (CEC) report on the massive dam project was formally unveiled on Wednesday. It recommends the government issue an environmental licence for the project -- with several conditions, including increased efforts to mitigate the loss of wildlife habitat.

Mackintosh called the 192-page document, details of which were published in Wednesday's Free Press, "a very robust report that gave good consideration" to Keeyask's potential environmental impacts.

He said, however, a report by the Public Utilities Board on the economic implications of the project and the results of the government's ongoing consultations with First Nations and Métis people on Keeyask -- both due next month -- will factor into the final wording of any environmental licence.

The CEC made 20 licensing recommendations while giving the project its blessing, but they are not binding on the government. Mackintosh said he will consider the recommendations in the context of the other two reports.

"We have no hesitation in strengthening certain areas of (environmental) concern. We went far beyond the licence recommendations on Bipole (III)," he said, referring to a new northern hydro transmission line.

Manitoba Hydro has said it would like to begin construction of Keeyask this summer. The 695-megawatt generating station, if approved, would begin producing electricity in 2019.

Mackintosh didn't want to speculate when approval might come, other than it will be done on a "timely basis."

"I may have further inquiries that I want staff to follow up on," he said. "The licence has to be done right."

Aboriginal groups who either oppose or have serious reservations about Keeyask lamented Wednesday the project's approval is a forgone conclusion.

"We knew from the beginning that the CEC was handcuffed and limited in the scope of its review," Manitoba Metis Federation president David Chartrand said in a statement.

"The decision to move forward on Keeyask had already been made," said Chartrand, who fears the dam and accompanying transmission line harm Métis harvesting and cultural activities.

Manitoba Hydro has already spent $1 billion in preparation for Keeyask, he said. "They (Hydro and the province) can't back out now."

Peguis First Nation, which claims treaty rights that extend provincewide, is also opposed to the project.

Peguis said the environmental approval process was flawed because it focused too much on the immediate area around the proposed dam as opposed to Keeyask's long-term effects over a broader region.

"We felt that there was not enough (study) done to proceed with the recommended approval," said Peguis spokesman Lloyd Stevenson.

A Manitoba environmental group that expressed concerns about the Clean Environment Commission hearings process said it was happy with a CEC recommendation all future environmental assessments of the project be made public and the Keeyask website be maintained for the life of the dam.

"We congratulate the CEC on these recommendations and urge minister Mackintosh to make sure all Keeyask reports are made public on a timely basis," said Gaile Whelan Enns of Manitoba Wildlands. "This would be a first, as it is not happening for the Wuskwatim dam, or any previous project."

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

2017 Brandon Sun Community Leader Awards
Brandon Sun - Readers Choice Results
Why Not Minot?

Social Media