The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION
BP warns of rising costs from its settlement with Gulf Coast businesses over 2010 spill
NEW ORLEANS - BP is warning investors that the price tag will be "significantly higher" than it initially estimated for its multibillion-dollar settlement with businesses and residents who claim the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico cost them money.
The London-based oil giant estimated last year that it would spend roughly $7.8 billion to resolve tens of thousands of claims covered by the settlement agreement. But in a regulatory filing this week, BP PLC said businesses' claims have been paid at much higher average amounts than it had anticipated.
The company also said it can't reliably estimate how much it will pay for unresolved business claims following a ruling Tuesday by the federal judge supervising the uncapped settlement. U.S District Judge Carl Barbier rejected BP's interpretation of certain settlement provisions.
Barbier upheld claims administrator Patrick Juneau's interpretation of settlement terms that govern how businesses' pre- and post-spill revenue and expenses — and the time periods for those dollar amounts — are used to calculate their awards.
BP had argued that Juneau's interpretation would lead to "absurd results" and "false positives," but the judge said the settlement agreement anticipated that "such results would sometimes occur."
"Objective formulas, the possibility of 'false positives,' and giving claimants flexibility to choose the most favourable time periods are all consequences BP accepted when it decided to buy peace through a global, class-wide resolution," Barbier wrote.
BP spokesman Geoff Morrell said the company believes the way Juneau is processing business economic loss claims is "contrary to the agreement."
"His approach has produced unjustified windfall payments to numerous business claimants," Morrell said in a statement, adding that BP will pursue "all available legal options" to challenge Barbier's decision.
BP already had revised its estimate for the total cost of the settlement before Barbier's ruling, saying earlier this year that it expected to pay $8.5 billion instead of the $7.8 billion it estimated when it first cut the deal.
In this week's regulatory filing, the company said it has been analyzing the processing of recent claims to determine if they can be used to predict future claims, but concluded it can't.
Excluding business claims that Juneau hasn't received or processed yet, the company now estimates it will pay $7.7 billion to resolve the rest of the claims covered by the settlement.
"If BP is successful in its challenge to the court's ruling, the total estimated cost of the settlement agreement will, nevertheless, be significantly higher than the current estimate of $7.7 billion because business economic loss claims not yet received or processed are not reflected in the current estimate and the average payments per claim determined so far are higher than anticipated," the company said.
Barbier also is presiding over a non-jury trial designed to determine the causes of BP's April 2010 well blowout and assign percentages of fault to the companies involved in the disaster, which killed 11 workers and spawned the nation's worst offshore oil spill.
The trial, which opened Feb. 25 and is scheduled to resume Monday, could last several months if BP doesn't settle separate claims by the federal government and Gulf states over environmental and economic damage from the spill.
- Rate this

-
-
We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.
You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.
Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.
There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.
Post Your Comment
The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
- Back to Top
- Return to Business Breaking News
Most Popular
- Westman woman ID'd as victim of Portage-area crash
- Crash victims lived life to fullest
- Big fine for tax-evading Dauphin pharmacy
- New shopping centre in mix
- Family safe after home burns
- What would you like to see in the proposed shopping centre south of Brandon? (choose all that apply)
- U.S. Civil Air Patrol flying over Canada
- Trailer burns in yard
- Judge acquits driver nabbed with bag of coke
- Ballot set for Meadows Ward byelection
- Pickup driver killed in crash with semi
- Crash victim 'good guy': principal
- Man killed in highway crash was Brandonite
- Westman woman ID'd as victim of Portage-area crash
- Three impaired drivers caught overnight
- Crash victims lived life to fullest
- Big fine for tax-evading Dauphin pharmacy
- Driver allegedly so impaired she had trouble walking
- New shopping centre in mix
- Brandon man caught breaking political donations rule
- Pickup driver killed in crash with semi
- Man killed in highway crash was Brandonite
- It's official: WestJet lands in Brandon on Sept. 3
- Crash victim 'good guy': principal
- Westman woman ID'd as victim of Portage-area crash
- Woman killed after crash with semi
- Highway crash turns deadly
- Police ask for help to find missing man
- Doc shut out of residency spot
- Eight Brandon girls woke up behind bars this morning
- Westman woman ID'd as victim of Portage-area crash
- Powwow will honour aboriginal grads
- Trust key to maintaining democracy
- Irradiation not the answer
- WestJet announcement a game changer for city
- Crash victim 'good guy': principal
- Powwow will honour aboriginal grads
- Wall demolition a blow to barbershop
- Pickup driver killed in crash with semi
- Three impaired drivers caught overnight
- Teen girl may have been sexually assaulted
- Don't be fooled by Hamilton
- Caldwell earns praise for stance on zoning
- Westman woman ID'd as victim of Portage-area crash
- Target: Opening Day review
- Letter to the editor -- Tax cuts can create problems
- Town Centre puts brakes on free parking
- Vigilante jailed after breaking into wrong home
- Hiking PST courageous move
- AS I SEE IT - RM of Glenwood's media stunt a black eye for Manitoba
- Princess Park assault victim 'didn't have a chance'
- Tax issue could be costly for mayor
- Crunching some WestJet numbers
- Wall demolition a blow to barbershop
- Big fine for tax-evading Dauphin pharmacy
- Man killed in highway crash was Brandonite
- Pickup driver killed in crash with semi
- Dome building looks great for its age
- Silver Star jet's 99 returns
- Lead found in Brandon water
- Crash victim 'good guy': principal
- Brandon man caught breaking political donations rule
- New shopping centre in mix
- Westman woman ID'd as victim of Portage-area crash
- It's official: WestJet lands in Brandon on Sept. 3
- Big fine for tax-evading Dauphin pharmacy
- Brandon to Calgary: $300 on WestJet
- Man killed in highway crash was Brandonite
- McCrae resigns from city council
- Wife of victim and mother of suspect speaks
- Wheat Kings steal show at bantam draft
- BU grad takes reins as dean
- Magic sweep exhibition series
- Wineglass etiquette causes nasty case of 'wine thumb'





Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Comments
You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.