Business Breaking News

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Peabody Energy says US regulators investigating power-plant project

By: Jim Suhr, The Associated Press

Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 at 3:02 PM | Comments: 0

ST. LOUIS - Federal security regulators are investigating Peabody Energy Corp.'s role in development of the largest coal-fueled power plant built in the U.S. in the past three decades, the company disclosed in its latest annual report.

St. Louis-based Peabody, the world's biggest private-sector coal producer, said the Securities and Exchange Commission served the company with a subpoena last month requesting information and documents related to the fledgling Prairie State project.

Peabody, in the filing Monday, did not elaborate. It said only that it was co-operating and "believes that such other pending or threatened proceedings are likely to be resolved without a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows."

Peabody spokesman Vic Svec said in an emailed statement Tuesday that "we look forward to sharing information on what is a highly successful project."

SEC spokeswoman Christina D'Amico declined to publicly discuss the matter, citing the agency's policy on those investigations.

The Prairie State Energy Campus in Illinois' Washington County, located southeast of St. Louis, includes a 1,600-megawatt electricity generating plant and an adjacent coal mine. Its two electricity generators went online last year.

The project began more than a decade ago, but it was dogged by construction snags and escalating costs. Peabody owns roughly 5 per cent of the campus, which the company developed with a consortium of other public power co-operatives in various states. The plant now serves 2.5 million households from Missouri to West Virginia.

Before construction began in October 2007, then-Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich called the effort the biggest private capital project ever planned for southern Illinois and hailed it as a milestone in helping revive Illinois' ailing coal fields, which in previous decades were overlooked in favour of cleaner burning Western coal.

Environmental and public health groups have argued that the plant would pose a health risk and diminish visibility in southeast Missouri's Mingo National Wildlife Refuge by releasing sulfur dioxide, mercury and other pollutants.

Rate this
This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Comments

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Comment

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.