Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Business
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Prosecutors in Colorado theatre shooting say state insanity statute is constitutional

FILE - In this July 23, 2012 file photo, James E. Holmes appears in Arapahoe County District Court in Centennial, Colo. Lawyers for Holmes have indicated their client might plead not guilty by reason of insanity. In court documents made public Friday, March 1, 2013, James Holmes' attorneys want the judge to declare portions of the state's insanity defense laws unconstitutional. The filings say the laws in which a defendant may waive their right to remain silent and reveal confidential medical information should be unconstitutional in cases involving the possibility of execution. (AP Photo/Denver Post, RJ Sangosti, Pool, File)

Enlarge Image

FILE - In this July 23, 2012 file photo, James E. Holmes appears in Arapahoe County District Court in Centennial, Colo. Lawyers for Holmes have indicated their client might plead not guilty by reason of insanity. In court documents made public Friday, March 1, 2013, James Holmes' attorneys want the judge to declare portions of the state's insanity defense laws unconstitutional. The filings say the laws in which a defendant may waive their right to remain silent and reveal confidential medical information should be unconstitutional in cases involving the possibility of execution. (AP Photo/Denver Post, RJ Sangosti, Pool, File)

DENVER - Prosecutors in the deadly Colorado movie theatre shooting are disputing defence arguments that the state law on insanity pleas is unconstitutional.

In court documents made public Wednesday, prosecutors said the statute has been upheld in other cases, and that judges have ways to protect defendants' rights.

Lawyers for suspect James Holmes filed motions last week asking the judge in the case to declare the law unconstitutional because it would require Holmes' attorneys to give prosecutors potentially incriminating information, such as mental health records, if he pleads not guilty by reason of insanity.

The defence said that violates Holmes' rights, including Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination. They said defendants who simply plead not guilty are not required to turn over such information.

Holmes is charged with multiple counts of murder and attempted murder in the July 20 shootings at a suburban Denver theatre that killed 12 and injured 70.

Prosecutors have not said whether they will pursue the death penalty. Under state law they have to announce their decision within 60 days once Holmes enters a plea.

That is scheduled to happen Tuesday.

In their motions filed last week, Holmes' lawyers revealed for the first time they were considering entering a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. But they said they could not give him adequate advice on how to plead unless the judge ruled on whether the insanity law was constitutional.

In their response, prosecutors said the Colorado Supreme Court — which would inevitably be asked to take up the question if the trial judge declared the law unconstitutional — would not act "in this hypothetical and advisory fashion," before Holmes had been acquitted or convicted.

Prosecutors also said the U.S. Supreme Court and the Colorado Supreme Court had already upheld laws requiring defendants to give prosecutors information about their mental health if they plead not guilty by reason of insanity.

They said the judge could issue an order or jury instructions preventing misuse of the information.

Prosecutors noted that the Colorado public defender's office, which is representing Holmes, made similar arguments against the insanity law in two other cases, and both times the trial judges ruled against them.

___

Follow Dan Elliott at http://twitter.com/DanElliottAP

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Why Not Minot?
Brandon Sun Business Directory
Brandon Sun Twitter
Canadian Mortgage Rates