Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Federal appeals court judges suggest they may let Apple monitor work but restrict his duties

NEW YORK, N.Y. - Federal appeals judges suggested Tuesday they may let a court monitor get back to reviewing Apple's antitrust procedures but only after limiting his duties.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments Tuesday on Apple Inc.'s request that the monitor be shut down until the appeals judges decide whether his appointment is appropriate. The monitor's work was temporarily suspended two weeks ago so the appeals panel could consider the issue.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote concluded last year that Apple colluded with book publishers to raise electronic book prices. She appointed Washington lawyer Michael Bromwich as monitor for two years after concluding Apple was not doing enough on its own to ensure it no longer violated antitrust laws.

Apple is challenging Cote's decision and her remedies. The appeals court didn't immediately rule whether the monitor's duties should remain suspended until it considers the merits of those challenges months from now.

Appeals court Judge Gerald Lynch asked Apple lawyer Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. if it would be acceptable if the 2nd Circuit spelled out the limits of Bromwich's duties while the appeals process proceeds.

Boutrous said such an order would help the situation but was not adequate to cure the constitutional deficiencies the company sees with the appointment of a monitor.

"Here we have a quasi-prosecutorial agent who's been appointed by the court," the attorney said.

In court papers, Boutrous called the appointment of Bromwich the first time a court has imposed a monitor over the objection of a party in a civil antitrust case. He said the judge gave Bromwich "extremely broad and extrajudicial powers" and let him "engage in investigatory, inquisitorial activities that far exceed the traditional role and powers of a judicial officer."

He said the monitor's stated objectives were to "'crawl into (the) company,' and persuade Apple to 'take down barriers' to his access so he can explore Apple's 'tone' and 'culture.'"

Boutrous added that Bromwich had already interfered with Apple's ability to manage its business by demanding that Apple's senior leaders meet with him on short notice.

"The district court has authorized him to interview essentially anyone at Apple, and to copy and review any of Apple's documents and deliver them to the judge, who is presiding over ongoing damages proceedings in a related case," the lawyer wrote.

Finnuala Tessier, a Department of Justice antitrust attorney, told the appeals court that a narrowed description of Bromwich's job duties was not necessary, because he was already limited to a passive role in which he reviews and evaluates antitrust compliance policies but has no authority to force Apple to make changes.

"The language of the injunction makes clear his tasks," she said. "He may not demand that Apple do anything."

In a ruling last month, Cote said the deteriorating relationship between Apple and the monitor was "unfortunate and disappointing," but she declined to disqualify Bromwich, a former inspector general for the Justice Department.

Cote noted that the Cupertino, Calif.-based company had turned over 303 pages of documents and permitted Bromwich over a three-month period to conduct 13 hours of interviews with 11 people, seven of them lawyers.

"If this limited amount of access constitutes 'irreparable harm' to Apple then the standard for irreparable harm is low indeed," the judge said.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media