Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

NAFTA panel won't review Canada's polar bear policy

MONTR�AL - An international trade panel has decided not to review whether Canada is enforcing its own environmental legislation to protect its polar bear population.

The Commission for Environmental Co-operation voted 2-1 to reject a request for an investigation into why Canada has chosen not to designate the bears as threatened or endangered. A U.S. environmental group had filed a submission claiming that decision leaves the bears without protection, despite the ongoing loss of their sea-ice habitat and resulting projections of declining numbers.

"We're obviously disappointed," said Sarah Uhleman, lawyer for the Center for Biological Diversity, which filed the complaint.

Uhleman pointed out the vote went against a recommendation from the commission's experts, who said there were "open questions" about Canada's polar bear policies.

"A political decision rejected an expert's recommendation."

The commission was formed as part of the North American Free Trade Agreement in an effort to ensure that open markets don't put downward pressure on environmental legislation. Canada, the U.S. and Mexico each have one vote.

The U.S voted against Canada.

The centre had argued that Canada failed to use the best available science to evaluate risks to the bears and did not meet its own legal deadlines to enact protection for them.

Uhleman said the submission's goal was both to restrict Canada's ongoing polar bear hunt and put pressure on the Canadian government to improve its record on fighting climate change, which experts agree is the chief threat to the bear's survival.

"It's about Canada recognizing that climate change is a really big threat to the polar bear and to the Arctic itself," she said. "Canada is not doing particularly well in fighting climate change."

The commission ruled that an investigation would simply republish information that was already public. It also declined to second-guess policy decisions made by the Canadian government.

"Certain issues the (experts) deemed to be 'central open questions' are aimed at seeking details on protected government decision-making processes and cabinet deliberations, which is not permitted under ... the agreement," the decision says.

Canada's polar bear policies have come under fire from the international community before. The United States has twice tried to convince a group responsible for monitoring and controlling trade in endangered species that Canadian polar bear products such as hides should come under the same restricted category as elephant ivory.

Canada has won both of those votes, but by narrowing margins.

Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq has said Canada has strong polar bear management based on both western science and traditional knowledge.

Populations are co-managed together with aboriginal communities under the terms of land-claim agreements.

— By Bob Weber in Edmonton

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
The First World War at 100
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media