Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Lifestyles
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Washington unions back businesses in fight over fish consumption, water quality

FILE - In a Sept. 28, 2011 file photo, a native fisherman displays a salmon he pulled from his net on the Duwamish River, in Seattle. The state Department of Ecology appears ready to sharply increase Washington's fish consumption rate, an obscure number that has huge implications because it helps set water quality standards. A higher number means fewer toxic pollutants would be permitted in waters. Unions representing Boeing machinists and mill workers are siding with businesses in a bitter fight over how much fish people eat, and thus how clean Washington state waters should be. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)

Enlarge Image

FILE - In a Sept. 28, 2011 file photo, a native fisherman displays a salmon he pulled from his net on the Duwamish River, in Seattle. The state Department of Ecology appears ready to sharply increase Washington's fish consumption rate, an obscure number that has huge implications because it helps set water quality standards. A higher number means fewer toxic pollutants would be permitted in waters. Unions representing Boeing machinists and mill workers are siding with businesses in a bitter fight over how much fish people eat, and thus how clean Washington state waters should be. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)

SEATTLE - Unions representing Boeing machinists and mill workers are siding with businesses in a bitter fight over how much fish people eat, and thus how clean Washington state waters should be.

The Machinists union and others are worried a new water quality standard being developed by the state would hurt jobs and economic development.

"We want clean water," said Tanya Hutchins, a spokeswoman for the Machinists union, which represents more than 32,000 workers in Puget Sound. "We just want to make sure it's a proposal that works for everyone."

Officials from the Machinists union, the Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers and others held a news conference Monday in Olympia to urge Gov. Jay Inslee to take a balanced approach.

The state Department of Ecology appears ready to sharply increase Washington's fish consumption rate, an obscure number that has huge implications because it helps set water quality standards. A higher number means fewer toxic pollutants would be permitted in waters.

The agency has been deliberating for months, with tribes, commercial fishermen and environmental groups lining up on one side, and Boeing Co., business groups and municipalities on the other.

A draft rule is expected this summer that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency must approve.

The EPA has told Washington that its current rate doesn't sufficiently protect those who eat the most fish, particularly Native Americans and Pacific Islanders. The federal agency also has warned Washington officials it plans to take over the process if the state doesn't come up with a final rule by the end of 2014.

"The governor has been clear that this decision will be guided by a commitment to healthy people, clean water and a strong economy," Inslee's spokeswoman, Jaime Smith, said Monday.

Studies have shown Washington residents eat more fish than other people nationwide. The state currently assumes people eat about 6 1/2 grams a day — or about a small fillet once a month.

The state is considering raising that fish consumption rate to between 125 and 225 grams of fish a day. Oregon set its rate at 175 grams a day, the highest for a U.S. state.

Tribes, environmental groups, commercial fishermen and others are pressing for a higher rate that protects all people. They urge Inslee and the state to prevent cancer-causing pollutants from entering the state's waters.

Northwest tribes, in particular, are concerned about the fish consumption rate because fish and shellfish play an important role in the diet and culture of its members.

Businesses, cities and counties, meanwhile, worry standards will be set so high they can't be achieved. Boeing in March raised concerns to Inslee that the proposals "will have unintended consequences for continued Boeing production in the state."

They note technology doesn't exist in some cases to limit certain pollutants. Environmental groups argue the standards would drive technological innovations.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
The First World War at 100
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media