MATTHEW KERR/BRANDON SUN
Enlarge Image
Finance Minister Stan Struthers talks about the 2012 budget at the Keystone Centre on Wednesday. Struthers addressed the gas tax, investing in infrastructure and budget cuts.
A group of 20 invited guests had the chance to question Manitoba Finance Minister Stan Struthers about the 2012-13 budget on Wednesday at the Keystone Centre.
Struthers presented the impacts his budget would have on Westman in 2012-13, noting that $5 million would be spent in the city of Brandon to build up dikes to 300-year flood levels.
Struthers said heavy lobbying from Brandon East NDP MLA Drew Caldwell was a factor in the inclusion of four new fully funded firefighter/paramedics for Brandon Fire and Emergency Services in this budget.
One new police officer for the Brandon Police Service will also be funded in this budget, Struthers said.
However, those new spending items come at a time when the province ran a projected $1.12-billion deficit last year, and is budgeted to run a $460-million deficit in 2012-13 after drawing from the Fiscal Stabilization Fund.
Keystone Centre board member George McLeod asked Struthers how long the province will be paying those bills and how long range planning would be impacted.
"It depends on a lot of things," Struthers said. "The flood happened right in the middle of the 2011-12 budget season. We are fixing bridges and roads connected to that event this year. It depends on whether the federal government comes through with its obligations in this. The feds haven’t come on board on all the ag-recovery plans we signed on to last year. Even on the farm side, they are coming a dollar short and a day late.
"The feds have said they are coming through. I keep checking my mailbox for the cheque and I haven’t seen it. If they come through, it shortens the time period where we are spending money on the flood."
Walter Finlay, a councillor with the RM of Glenwood, said he was pleased to see the government take a look at its spending habits.
"I have told the previous minister of finance and the one before that, that if I ran my business by spending more than I took in every year, sooner or later I’d be in trouble," he said.
Struthers said overall, federal transfer payments to the province have "flatlined."
"They can spin it any way they like, we’re not getting any more money than what we got the year before or the year before that," Struthers said. "That has an impact on our ability to provide comparable services in education and health care at comparable rates of taxation with other provinces."
RM of Sifton Reeve Rick Plaisier, a member of the Municipal Health Services Committee, said he was taken aback by the province’s decision to slash the number of health authorities to five from 11. He asked Struthers if the job losses expected from the amalgamation will come from the administration ranks.
"We don’t want there to be front-line (service) cuts," Struthers said. "That would defeat the purpose of why we are doing this."
Plaisier asked whether the new health board would be an elected one, more accountable to the people they serve rather than a government-appointed one, as is the current practice.
"The question always comes up that if you start electing, will it cause the revolution that happened in the U.S. a couple hundred years ago," Struthers said. "If you elect and don’t give the ability to tax, what responsibilities go along with that? It is a big question and we should have a discussion about it. There’s still a lot of discussions that need to take place."
Struthers addressed the 2.5 cent per litre gas tax that will be introduced, the first such increase since 1993. Taxes on purple gas (for off-road use) will rise three cents per litre.
"It’s still the second-lowest in the country and it is the main way we fund infrastructure projects in Manitoba," he said. "Whatever money we generate through this and the $35 increase in vehicle registrations, every dollar is going back into infrastructure. You know as well as anyone the damage resulting from the flood, never mind the challenges we would face if the flood had never happened."
Finlay asked Struthers to drive Highway 21 from Highway 2 to the U.S. border.
"Don’t bother taking a car, because you won’t make it," Finlay said. "I’m serious. They are hauling rock from Stonewall to Hartney. I have no idea who decided to do that, but why would you haul stone 200 miles when you can get it from 10 miles away? They are hauling rock in from Ethelbert and dumping it a mile from where they got it last year. Talk about waste. That costs one pile of money."
The government plans to broaden the reach of the provincial sales tax, making it applicable to a wider variety of goods and services. Struthers said the government needs to raise its revenues and that the increases show the government is getting its house in order.
"You just raised my insurance bill $600," Finlay told Struthers.
Struthers noted the consultations before the budget and the ones afterwards are a key part of the process.
"Budgets are about priorities," he said. "Budgets are about listening to people and reflecting those priorities in the spending, expenditives and revenues that you undertake. It’s more than putting together a bunch of numbers. And when you have a flood and a global recession, you know you are going to have challenges."
» kborkowsky@brandonsun.com
Republished from the Brandon Sun print edition April 19, 2012
Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 3 Comments
You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Posted by:YvetteKirk
April 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM
That's it for me. I have finally decided to face reality. I will be retiring in 5-7 yrs at which point I will be moving to AB or SK where my vote actually counts, the tax rate is afforable and where all levels of government take fiscal responsibility seriously.<br /><br />That is the opposite here where the way of doing business is to increase taxes so we can hand more out to those not paying any. At the same time we discourage business from coming into the Prov and encourage those here to move West because we are not competitive from both a tax and a labour perspective. All the while we are being crushed under the weight of our own debt. I do no not want to be here in retirement when the whole thing comes crashing down.<br /><br />This will never change under an NDP government because their base, Unions and welfare recipients, own them. And because we have 70% of our population in one city where the Unions and welfare recipients own the majority of the seats this situation will never change meaning the rest of our votes do not matter.
Posted by:YvetteKirk
April 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM
"Struthers said overall, federal transfer payments to the province have "flatlined."
He is either lying or we have a FM that cannot add. For instance we all know that they recieved a 6% increase in health care funding alone. None of which they spent on health care. Instead they use it to fund their base - Unions and welfare recipients. Since the 2005/06 FY transfers to MB have increased overall by about $3B. $648M last year alone. Here is the official GOC data to prove it. If we cannot trust the govt on this basic fact then we should not trust anything they say.
http://www.fin.gc.ca/fedprov/mtp-eng.asp
Posted by:Deborah Boschman
April 19, 2012 at 2:57 PM
`20 invited guests had the opportunity to question Finance Minister Stan Struthers.`
We`ve NEVER had questions CONTROLLED like this before!
IF you are TRULY representing the electorate, then WHY can`t you take questions from the general population?
When Greg Selinger was Finance Minister, ANYONE who had a question was able to ask him their question.
This sounds like the MEDIUM was trying to be CONTROLLED.
I am NOT happy AT ALL with questions being LIMITED to 20 INVITED guests!
THIS is NOT truly democracy, in my opinion.
I DON`T THINK that the electorate should STAND FOR or TOLERATE this!
I think that ACCOUNTABILITY DEMANDS that you should be able to answer some of the tougher questions.
This action simply DOES NOT sit well with me at all!
What were you AFRAID was going to happen, Mr. Stan Struthers?
What were you trying to PREVENT from happening, Mr. Struthers?
I think that the MAJORITY electorate DESERVES to be treated BETTER than this by our provincially elected officials.
Then we WONDER WHY individuals DON`T EVEN BOTHER getting out to the polls to vote.
It is actions such as this which greatly DISCOURAGE individuals from participating in the democratic process in the first place.
I sure WOULD NOT WANT to see this practice repeated.
There was a liberal candidate running in one of our past Federal elections and I grilled him EXTENSIVELY.
He stated publicly I was simply exercising my democratic right.
Years later I apologized to him and have RESPECT for him.