Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Agriculture minister wants Mexico to retaliate against U.S. meat-labelling rules

OTTAWA - Federal Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz is urging his Mexican counterpart to come up with retaliatory measures against meat-labelling requirements imposed by the United States.

Ritz says country-of-origin labelling, also known as COOL, is costing the North American meat industry billions of dollars. He made the comments after meeting with Mexican Agriculture Secretary Enrique Mart�nez and U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack in Mexico City this week.

"I reminded Secretary Vilsack that Canada is preparing to implement retaliatory measures once authorized by the WTO (World Trade Organization)," Ritz said in a conference call Wednesday.

"I made it very clear that Canada will not blink on this issue."

Ritz said the list of measures has caught U.S. attention and he wants Mexico to "keep up the pressure."

The agriculture minister said legislation prevents Mexican officials from going public with retaliatory measures until a ruling comes from the WTO. But he suggested that even talking about having a comprehensive list could help with public opinion in the United States.

Ritz said his discussion with Vilsack was candid, although nothing new came out of it.

"I did get the feeling that they are coming to grips with the fact that this one is slipping away from them, but of course, it's never over 'til it's over," said Ritz.

"I think there's a growing recognition that this is harming U.S. industry far more than it would ever be any help to American consumers."

U.S. rules on country-of-origin labels, introduced in 2002 and enforced since 2008, are blamed for reducing Canadian cross-border meat exports by half.

Some U.S. companies have said they can't afford to sort, label and store meat from Canada differently than meat from domestic animals. Industry groups argue the information is of no real value to the consumer. Opponents also say the rules violate free-trade agreements.

However, the provisions are supported by some border-area ranchers who compete with Canadians and Mexicans, and by their allies in Congress.

— By Jennifer Graham in Regina

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
Sudden Surge: Flood of 2014
Opportunity Magazine — The Bakken
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media