Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Another Conservative judicial appointment faces a legal challenge

The Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa on Tuesday, July 10, 2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Enlarge Image

The Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa on Tuesday, July 10, 2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

OTTAWA - The Conservative government is defending its appointment of a judge to the Quebec appeal court in the face of the latest legal challenge from a Toronto lawyer who says Ottawa is breaking the rules.

Justice Minister Peter MacKay said Monday that Federal Court of Appeal judge Robert Mainville is eligible to sit on the Quebec Court of Appeal.

Toronto lawyer Rocco Galati and the Constitutional Rights Centre are asking the Federal Court of Canada to declare that the Constitution Act, 1867, prohibits such an appointment.

Galati's submission, filed Monday, also argues that Mainville is not currently a member of the Quebec bar, and that membership is a prerequisite under the Constitution Act for nomination to a Quebec court.

The Conservative government is trying to park Mainville on the Quebec appeal court before appointing him to the Supreme Court of Canada later this year, filling a pending vacancy from the province, Galati contends.

He believes the federal move is a calculated response to his successful challenge of the government's attempt to appoint Federal Court of Appeal judge Marc Nadon directly to the Supreme Court.

Galati contested that appointment, which the high court ruled invalid in March on the grounds it violated Quebec-specific provisions of the Supreme Court Act.

In first appointing Mainville to the Quebec appeal court, Ottawa is trying to ensure no similar procedural bumps when it later names him to the Supreme Court to replace Louis LeBel, who retires Nov. 30, Galati alleges.

"Obviously, they're trying to get around the Nadon ruling so that they can send him up to Ottawa in November," Galati said in an interview.

"It's just a cynical disregard, disdain and flagrant subversion of the Constitution."

Fuelling speculation the government intends to ultimately name Mainville to the Supreme Court was his appearance on a recent short list of candidates for the post obtained by the Globe and Mail newspaper.

In the House of Commons, NDP Leader Tom Mulcair accused Prime Minister Stephen Harper of baldly trying to do an end-run around the rules.

"Why is he defying both the letter and the spirit of the Nadon decision?" Mulcair asked.

MacKay, who handled the opposition's questions, did not directly address the point of whether Mainville is indeed being groomed for the high court. He simply defended Mainville's qualifications, saying the government is guided by merit and legal excellence.

"Mr. Mainville is an expert in public-sector law negotiations, administrative law, constitutional law," MacKay said.

"I believe his wealth of legal knowledge will be welcome at the Supreme Court and will be of significant benefit to the Quebec Court of Appeal."

MacKay was later pressed by Liberal MP Sean Casey on his use of the term "Supreme Court," which Casey took as an admission — inadvertent or otherwise — that Mainville would eventually be appointed to the high court.

"The Superior Court of Quebec is considered a Supreme Court in the province," MacKay coolly replied.

After question period, MacKay said the courts would decide Mainville's eligibility to sit as a judge in Quebec.

"I think he's eligible."

Follow @JimBronskill on Twitter

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
Sudden Surge: Flood of 2014
Opportunity Magazine — The Bakken
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media