Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Another train derails in northern Manitoba; passenger service affected

WINNIPEG - Via Rail says another derailment on a troubled northern Manitoba railway line has forced an interruption of passenger service between Thompson and The Pas until further notice.

At least two cars on a Hudson Bay Railway freight train derailed Thursday night about 55 kilometres north of Gillam, said Merv Tweed, president of OmniTrax Canada, which owns the line.

Via spokeswoman Mylene Belanger said she didn't have any details about the derailment and Hudson Bail Railway officials could not be reached for comment.

"We sent crews out as soon as it happened," said Tweed. "Again, the challenge we face is even just in communication. The location where it is, we had to move around to find cell service."

Via said passengers scheduled to travel on the affected routes will be offered alternate transportation, adding that trains will continue to operate between Churchill and Thompson, and The Pas and Winnipeg.

There was a derailment on the same line on June 3, forcing the suspension of passenger trains between Gillam and Churchill until mid-July.

The Manitoba government said at that time that it might be open to providing more public money to Omnitrax in the future, adding any discussions would also have to involve the federal government.

The rail line has a long history of delays and service interruptions due to the remote boggy terrain it covers.

In 2007, the federal and Manitoba governments put up $20 million each under a five-year deal to help Omnitrax with repairs.

Omnitrax, which operates the port of Churchill, agreed to put up $20 million of its own over 10 years, along with another $2 million to $3 million annually on track maintenance.

Omnitrax Canada has said this year's problems stem from a harsh winter and unusual weather that has caused ground movement.

Omnitrax had intended to conduct test runs of crude oil shipments along the line, but announced Friday that it was backing away from the plan.

The idea had met with strong opposition from environmental groups and others who feared a spill would be disastrous for the environment.

(CJOB, The Canadian Press)

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
The First World War at 100

Social Media