National Breaking News

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Canada watching to see if border pact threatened by U.S. budget cuts

By: Mike Blanchfield, The Canadian Press

Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013 at 4:35 PM | Comments: 0

Minister of Foreign Affairs John Baird responds to a question during question period in the House of Commons Tuesday February 26, 2013 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

OTTAWA - Canada will be watching closely to see whether a massive scheduled budget cut in the U.S. this week will affect the Beyond the Border pact between the two countries, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said Wednesday.

Unless polarized U.S. lawmakers can come together, about US$85 billion in cuts are set to hit U.S. federal programs starting Friday.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said earlier this week there would be pain for the Canada-U.S. border because her department would have to cut 5,000 border-patrol agents if the cuts go through.

Baird said the deal is key to the prosperity of both countries.

"We're going to continue to be very, very focused on it," he said Wednesday.

"After March 1, we'll see what challenges arise. Obviously, this is not the way Canada would prefer to make these types of budgetary decisions. But it is what it is."

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama signed the vaunted border deal 14 months ago.

It is designed to speed trade across the 49th parallel while protecting the North American continent from terrorist threats.

Napolitano said the looming cuts, known as sequestration, will cause pain for Canadians, in particular at the busy Canada-U.S. border.

"Sequester will be felt up there because there's only a few big crossing places for trade on the Canadian-U.S. border and they're really important crossing places," Napolitano said in a speech to a Washington think tank.

"In fact, trade-wise, they're probably the No. 1 or 2 crossing places in the world. As sequester evolves and we have to furlough people who are port officers and not fill vacant positions, and not pay overtime, we're unfortunately going to see those lines really stretch."

If Congress fails to reach a deal to avert the cuts, Napolitano said, the jobs will be lost.

Cuts to customs and border security staff will increase congestion and hurt Canadian companies, said Fen Hampson, director of the global security program at the Waterloo, Ont., Centre for International Governance Innovation.

"More generally, if there is a slowdown in U.S. growth as a result of sequestration's general adverse impact on the U.S. economy as many predict, it will also hurt trade," said Hampson.

"There is no win with sequestration and the current impending disaster underlines how far we really have to go to secure a meaningful beyond-the-border deal."

In addition to the 5,000 border patrol agents, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection is preparing to reduce its work hours by the equivalent of 2,750 inspectors as well, meaning cargo inspections at the border could drag on interminably for Canadian exporters.

David Jacobson, the U.S. ambassador, has said repeatedly that the best thing his country can do for Canada is to get its fiscal house in order.

With this latest round of gridlock gripping Washington, various U.S. federal departments and agencies are laying out how they plan to cut costs.

The Pentagon will be forced to impose US$55 billion in cuts and will call on 800,000 civilian employees to take unpaid time off.

Napolitano's remarks raise questions about the future progress on the border deal.

In part, its success will be measured on the implementation of a series of pilot projects between the two countries.

"Sequestration is also going to make it much harder to get the attention of the White House and those who are friendly to making a deal with Canada in the U.S. Congress," said Hampson.

In December, the two countries said in a progress report that they'd made significant progress but realize there's still much work to do.

One outstanding project is the next generation of cross-border law enforcement, which will see police and security officials work even more closely than they do now.

It would build on joint border-policing efforts by creating integrated teams in areas such as intelligence and criminal investigations.

Two pilot projects were supposed to be up and running by last summer, but the progress report says officials are still evaluating the "operational and legal requirements" involved.

Rate this
This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Comments

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Comment

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.