National Breaking News

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Duffy claims confusion at Senate paperwork, but forms not all that vexing

By: The Canadian Press

Saturday, Feb. 23, 2013 at 2:44 PM | Comments: 0

Senator Mike Duffy's cottage is seen in Cavendish, P.E.I. on Saturday, Feb. 23, 2013. Duffy had stated his principle residence is in Prince Edward Island, the province he represents in the Senate. Duffy says he will repay the government for the housing allowance he has claimed since 2010. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan

OTTAWA - Sen. Mike Duffy is blaming confusing paperwork for his mistake in claiming a Senate housing allowance he was not entitled to receive.

But the paperwork in question — a yearly declaration of primary and secondary residences —hardly seems complicated.

Related Items

Articles
- 'I may have been mistaken' claiming housing allowance, says Sen. Mike Duffy

Senators are required to fill out the declaration to determine if they are entitled to the housing allowance, intended to compensate those who maintain a secondary residence in the national capital region while fulfilling their parliamentary duties.

The residency declaration, which Duffy described as "vague," required the senator to fill in the address of his primary residence in the province he was appointed to represent.

Hence, he filled in the address of his Cavendish cottage in Prince Edward Island, not his home in the Ottawa suburb of Kanata, where he lived for years before his appointment to the Senate.

What Duffy doesn't mention is that the declaration also asks senators to check a box indicating whether or not their primary residence is within 100 kilometres of Parliament Hill.

In order to obtain the allowance, Duffy would have had to tick the box saying his primary residence is outside the capital region.

The declaration also asks for information regarding a senator's secondary residence in the capital region — a section "to be filled only by senators whose primary residence is more than 100 kilometres from Parliament Hill."

The form goes on to spell out the conditions for being reimbursed for ownership or rental of a secondary residence in the national capital region.

The section concludes with another box which Duffy would have had to check to collect the allowance, declaring that "I own a secondary residence in the NRC and meet the above conditions."

Rate this
This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Comments

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Comment

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.