Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Feds suffer rejection in Senate case in Quebec

OTTAWA - The federal government has suffered a legal setback as Quebec's Court of Appeal refused to suspend its review of Senate reforms.

The Quebec government has asked it's highest judicial body to review the constitutionality of the Conservatives' Senate Reform Act.

But the Harper government has filed its own application for review before the Supreme Court of Canada and it did not want the Quebec review to be released before its own.

The federal government hopes to introduce fixed terms for senators and allow provinces to hold elections for senators when a seat becomes available.

But some provinces argue that the legislation is unconstitutional without their consent.

Reforming the Senate has long been a Conservative promise, with proposals emerging since the party came to power in 2006.

Last month, the federal government announced its intention to have the Supreme Court of Canada vet the reforms.

Meanwhile, lawyers for the federal government made a request to have the Quebec court stop its review process.

On Tuesday, a panel of three judges dismissed the motion.

The Quebec hearings could be held in September. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of Canada plans to hold hearings in mid-November.

The Court of Appeal is likely to render a judgment before the highest court in the country — a result that Ottawa was trying to avoid.

Meanwhile Tuesday, in the House of Commons MPs were debating a non-binding NDP bill calling on the Senate to be abolished altogether.

It's a symbolically powerful motion, in that one house of Parliament is debating the elimination of the other. But it's constitutionally non-binding and has no hope of passing anyway, since the opposition has only a minority of seats.

The motion was tabled with the Senate mired in a spending scandal.

As for the Quebec court decision, the provincial government expressed its satisfaction and hope that the Supreme Court would draw from the provincial court verdict when shaping its own conclusion.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Brandon Sun Business Directory
Brandon Sun Twitter