Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Gamblers who lost $2M at Fallsview Casino lose another round in casino lawsuit

TORONTO - Four high-stakes gamblers who lost more than $2 million playing roulette lost another round Tuesday in a legal bid to get their money back — and it's left them on the hook for nearly $200,000 extra.

The four roulette players tried to sue Fallsview Casino and the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, alleging that the Niagara Falls, Ont., casino's rule for what should happen in the event of a so-called floating ball was illegal.

The casino's roulette dealers were allowed to remove a ball if it was either stationary while the wheel was spinning or if it just continued to spin around the wheel for a long time without falling into a numbered pocket.

The gamblers argued that the casino had to get the commission to approve the "floating ball" policy as a rule of play and since they didn't, all the roulette games there were illegal.

They had sued for $14 million, but asked for the courts to at least make the casino return the millions they lost playing roulette.

Not only have two levels of courts now declined to make the casino give them any money back, but the courts have also ordered the gamblers to pay the casino and the commission's legal bills each step of the way.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed their case Tuesday, finding that the policy didn't constitute a rule of play and therefore didn't need the commission's approval.

The decision leaves the gamblers owing the casino and the commission $25,000 in legal bills.

That's on top of the $170,000 the Superior Court ordered the roulette players to pay the casino and the commission after that court dismissed the case last year.

The four roulette players — Joaquim Moreira, Moshe Braunstein, Remo Gigliotti and Tebaldo Barbuscio — spent many hours playing roulette together in the casino's high rollers area, usually betting more than $1,000 per spin, since Fallsview opened in June 2004, according to an Appeal Court ruling.

They collectively lost $2.1 million, the ruling said.

Braunstein and Barbuscio borrowed $34,700 and $75,000, respectively, from the casino in 2006 and 2007 to support their gambling.

Ontario Lottery and Gaming started demanding they repay their loans in late 2007 and early 2008, and a few months later the gamblers launched their lawsuit, the Appeal Court said.

The casino asked the Superior Court to dismiss the lawsuit before even going to trial and the judge agreed.

He ruled that even if the roulette games were illegal, the players weren't owed any money back because roulette dealers returned all bets on floating balls.

OLG had also sued Braunstein and Barbuscio in January 2009 for repayment of their gambling loans. As of January 2009, when that suit was launched, Barbuscio had repaid $11,000 of the $75,000, the Appeal Court said. The decision does not note how much, if any, Braunstein had paid back by then.

At the same time the Superior Court judge dismissed the gamblers' lawsuit, he granted the OLG lawsuit.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Brandon Sun Business Directory
Brandon Sun Twitter