Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Greenpeace calls on Ottawa to eliminate liability cap for nuclear operators

The Pickering Nuclear Generating Station in Pickering, Ont. is pictured on March 16, 2011. Greenpeace Canada is calling on the government to do away with the cap on how much nuclear operators would have to pay in the event of an accident. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darren Calabrese

Enlarge Image

The Pickering Nuclear Generating Station in Pickering, Ont. is pictured on March 16, 2011. Greenpeace Canada is calling on the government to do away with the cap on how much nuclear operators would have to pay in the event of an accident. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darren Calabrese

TORONTO - Greenpeace Canada is calling on the government to do away with the cap on how much nuclear operators would have to pay in the event of an accident.

The Nuclear Liability Act states that nuclear operators must have insurance for up to $75 million.

Shawn-Patrick Stensil with Greenpeace Canada says that would not be nearly enough to compensate people who would be affected within 20 kilometres of nuclear stations such as those in Pickering, Ont., and Darlington, Ont.

The federal government has tried before to raise the cap, but the last effort to increase the cap to $650 million died on the order paper when the 2011 federal election was called.

But Stensil says Ottawa should remove the cap entirely and amend the act so that suppliers, not just operators, could be held liable if faulty equipment causes an accident.

Greenpeace has released a report on worldwide nuclear liability to coincide with the second anniversary of Japan's Fukushima disaster.

The report says that the victims of Fukushima have not received enough compensation to rebuild their lives and points to nuclear liability laws as a source of the problem.

"What we're learning from Japan is, like other industries, everyone in the nuclear industry should be held accountable if responsible for an accident," Stensil said. "That's one of the best incentives you have for safety."

The minister of natural resources said in an emailed statement that "NDP filibustering" is why previous attempts to increase the cap did not pass Parliament. The statement from Joe Oliver did not answer a question about whether the government was preparing to bring in another bill to try to raise the cap.

"Our government is committed to periodically assessing financial liability to make certain that Canada's polluter-pay system remains among the strongest in the world, and that is exactly what we will do," Oliver said.

Discussions in Canada about how to modernize nuclear liability here are only taking place between the government and the nuclear industry, Stensil said.

"This current law protects the nuclear industry," he said. "They have a vested interest in keeping the law the way it is. We need to have a broader discussion about how that law is modernized and that should involve the people that would be impacted in the event of an accident."

The industry was behind the government's last effort to raise the cap, said John Stewart, the acting director of policy at the Canadian Nuclear Association.

"Industry supports and has for a long time supported a new liability limit," he said. "We're very supportive of this getting done."

Eliminating a cap all together, however, would likely make it very difficult to finance large energy projects, Stewart said.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Brandon Sun Business Directory
Brandon Sun Twitter