Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Supreme Court of Canada grants oral hearings bong shop owner, employee

The Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa on Tuesday, July 10, 2012. Lawyers for a B.C. bong shop owner and one of his employees will get a rare opportunity to present oral arguments as to why the Supreme Court of Canada should hear their appeal. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Enlarge Image

The Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa on Tuesday, July 10, 2012. Lawyers for a B.C. bong shop owner and one of his employees will get a rare opportunity to present oral arguments as to why the Supreme Court of Canada should hear their appeal. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

OTTAWA - Lawyers for the owner of a British Columbia bong shop and one of his employees will get a rare opportunity to present oral arguments as to why the Supreme Court of Canada should hear their appeal.

It's a highly unusual move for the top court, which normally rules on leave-to-appeal applications based on written documents.

Then again, it's a highly unusual case.

Timothy Felger, the bong shop owner and a B.C. pot activist, expected undercover police officers to respect a posted sign ordering the cops to stay away.

Not surprisingly, they didn't.

Felger and his employee, Natasha Healy, were charged after a sting operation at the shop in Abbotsford, B.C., in 2009.

Undercover officers bought marijuana on five separate occasions and also saw other customers making similar purchases.

Felger and Healy argued at trial that a posted sign instructing police to stay out without a warrant meant the sting amounted to an unreasonable search.

The trial judge ruled the evidence could not be used and acquitted the pair in 2012, but the B.C. Court of Appeal has ordered a new trial.

The appeals court said in a written decision that the store was a public place, meaning the police were free to investigate marijuana sales there.

"An objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in a retail store could not be achieved simply by posting a sign excluding law enforcement officers," wrote Justice Nicole Garson in a unanimous judgment.

Felger and Healy's lawyers asked the Supreme Court for leave to appeal the decision.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court took the rare step of granting them an oral hearing.

Oral hearings can be granted in criminal cases involving an indictable offence if the appeal court set aside an acquittal and ordered a new trial.

"This is a very rare thing at the Supreme Court," said Adam Dodek, a University of Ottawa law professor.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Election 2014
Brandon Sun Business Directory
The First World War at 100
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media