Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

The five Senate reform questions the Supreme Court answered on Friday

OTTAWA - In the Senate reform ruling handed down on Friday, the federal government posed five questions to the Supreme Court of Canada. Here are the high court's answers.

1.Can the federal government unilaterally limit the term served by senators?


"Fixed terms provide a weaker security of tenure," the ruling says. "They imply a finite time in office and necessarily offer a lesser degree of protection from the potential consequences of freely speaking one's mind on the legislative proposals of the House of Commons."

2. Can the federal government unilaterally create a consultative election process for choosing whom to appoint to the Senate?


"The implementation of consultative elections would amend the Constitution of Canada by fundamentally altering its architecture. It would modify the Senate's role within our constitutional structure as a complementary legislative body of sober second thought."

3. Can the federal government establish a framework to enable provinces to create their own consultative election process?


"We conclude that introducing a process of consultative elections for the nomination of senators would change our Constitution's architecture, by endowing senators with a popular mandate which is inconsistent with the Senate's role as a complementary legislative chamber of sober second thought. This would constitute an amendment to the Constitution of Canada in relation to the method of selecting senators."

4. Can the federal government unilaterally repeal the constitutional requirement that a senator must own $4,000 worth of property in the province he or she is appointed to represent?

Yes, except for Quebec.

"We conclude that the net worth requirement ... can be repealed by Parliament under the unilateral federal amending procedure. However, a full repeal of the real property requirement ...requires the consent of Quebec's legislative assembly."

5. Would abolition of the Senate require the consent of seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population or unanimous consent?


"As for Senate abolition, it requires the unanimous consent of the Senate, the House of Commons and the legislative assemblies of all Canadian provinces."

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.


Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
Sudden Surge: Flood of 2014
Opportunity Magazine — The Bakken
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media