Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Opinion
Classified Sites

Brandon Sun - PRINT EDITION

GUEST COLUMNIST - Third handout to political parties not acceptable

When you think of priorities for how your tax dollars are spent, what comes to mind?

Many would say "roads," "health care," "policing," "getting the provincial government’s debt under control" or perhaps even "reducing taxes."

It’s probably fair to say most bookies in Las Vegas would bet against the majority of Manitobans picking "giving more tax dollars to political parties" as a top priority.

But sadly, Premier Greg Selinger seems to still support giving even more tax dollars to political parties.

According to a new government report, Selinger’s NDP will be eligible to receive an additional $278,811 courtesy of taxpayers.

The report suggests the Liberals and Progressive Conservatives will be eligible for $63,255 and $242,712 respectively as well; although the PCs have said they won’t take the money.

Not surprisingly, every excuse the NDP has come up with to defend the new handout scheme they brought in just doesn’t hold water.

Premier Selinger’s party claims political parties need another handout from taxpayers because the NDP ‘cleaned up’ politics by banning donations from businesses and unions back in 2001.

That obviously begs the question — how did Selinger’s party win elections in 2003, 2007 and 2011 without the new handout scheme or donations from unions or businesses?

And it wasn’t like we saw Selinger hitchhiking to campaign announcements in the last election. Nor was he putting up homemade lawn signs.

His party ran a campaign with glitzy new signs, a swanky vehicle for him to drive around in and they paid for tons of attack ads. Clearly, they aren’t hurting for money.

Consider that during the 2003 election year Manitobans gave $4,324,757 to the NDP, Progressive Conservatives, Liberals and Greens combined. Yet by the 2011 election year, Manitobans donated $5,384,485 — a 25 per cent increase.

How can political parties raise so much? Well, what many people don’t know is they already receive two existing handouts from taxpayers.

First, when you make a $100 donation to a charity, you get a provincial tax credit for $10.80.

However, when you donate $100 to a political party, you get a tax credit for $75.

Yes, you read that right. If you donate to a charity like Osborne House in Winnipeg (they help women across the province who are victims of domestic abuse) you get a tax credit that is a fraction of what you would get for donating to a political party.

The second way political parties receive funding occurs during election time. When they spend money on things like election signs and brochures during campaigns, they receive a cheque from the government for half of their expenditures.

So if they spend $100,000 on brochures, the government will cut them a cheque for $50,000.

The real reason behind Selinger’s push for a new funding scheme seems to come down to the fact his party used to fundraise more than their opponents.

Yet over the last few years they’ve fallen behind the Progressive Conservatives.

Instead of forcing taxpayers to help his party make up the fundraising difference, Selinger should crack the whip on his party to earn more voluntary donations.

Who knows, if Selinger’s party focused more on addressing Manitobans’ priorities, perhaps fundraising wouldn’t be so hard for them.

Republished from the Brandon Sun print edition March 2, 2013

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

When you think of priorities for how your tax dollars are spent, what comes to mind?

Many would say "roads," "health care," "policing," "getting the provincial government’s debt under control" or perhaps even "reducing taxes."

Please subscribe to view full article.

Already subscribed? Login to view full article.

Not yet a subscriber? Click Here to Signup

When you think of priorities for how your tax dollars are spent, what comes to mind?

Many would say "roads," "health care," "policing," "getting the provincial government’s debt under control" or perhaps even "reducing taxes."

Subscription required to view full article.

A subscription to the Brandon Sun Newspaper is required to view this article. Please update your user information if you are already a newspaper subscriber.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Why Not Minot?
Brandon Sun Business Directory
Brandon Sun Twitter