Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Opinion
Classified Sites

Brandon Sun - PRINT EDITION

Leave wildlife alone already

“We recognize that when you release a rehabilitated animal, you’re giving it a second chance at being a wild animal, and that’s a successful outcome from a wildlife rehabilitation point of view.”

— Jim Duncan, Manitoba Conservation

While their hearts may be in the right place, anyone who believes that Manitoba Conservation did the wrong thing by releasing two young bear cubs back into the wild should give their heads a shake.

Provincial officials have only acted in the best interests of the animals.

As it has been widely reported for several weeks, a single male black bear cub was found by the side of a St. Malo-area road in late March by local resident Rene Dubois, who said the cub was malnourished and orphaned.

The CBC reported that Dubois and his wife nursed him back to health with milk and formula from a baby bottle, as well as honey and fruit.

Initially, Dubois said he had contacted an official with Manitoba Conservation about the animal, but was told it would likely need to be destroyed. Not satisfied with that answer, the couple decided to try to find a different solution.

They nicknamed the cub Makoon and tried to get the bear into local animal sanctuaries — an unsuccessful venture as these places don’t take bears.

Then less than two weeks after he contacted Manitoba Conservation, officials from the government department took Makoon away.

From that point on, Makoon spent his days with another orphaned bear cub at the Assiniboine Park Zoo and separated from human interference, as it should have been all along. Under the supervision of wildlife biologists, both animals had learned to play, climb and forage for food during their time at the zoo. As a result, they were deemed rehabilitated enough to return to the wild.

Last week, the two cubs, described by provincial officials as in “excellent condition” and “quite large for their age,” were released back into the wild in a remote part of the province. The province would not say exactly when or where in Manitoba the two bears were released, though they noted the area has a variety of plentiful food sources including eggs, fish and berries.

As Jim Duncan observes above, that is a blessing for the cubs, who were given a second chance at being what they are — wild animals. As the National Post reported, Manitoba, like other provinces, assesses all its orphaned cubs and those deemed unfit for the wild may either be euthanized or relocated to zoos if there is space.

However, their release occurred in spite of protests by Winnipeg Humane Society chief executive Bill McDonald who called the province’s actions “virtually a death sentence.” McDonald wasn’t alone — at least 40 people rallied outside the zoo on Wednesday afternoon and the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs Grand Chief Derek Nepinak waded into the controversy by saying he too was upset by the decision.

Pictures and video of the cute little bear cub have flooded news media and Internet sites across Manitoba, feeding an outpouring of both curiosity and sympathy for Makoon’s fate. There’s even been a petition with 10,000 signatures asking the province not to release Makoon into the wild.

This is simply foolishness. Bears are not domesticated animals and they should not be treated as if they are, no matter how cute they may appear. They are far more dangerous when they become used to humans — ask any rural resident who lives around the Riding Mountain National Park region.

Were the bears released too early? The Humane Society may say yes, but bear experts here and in Minnesota, who have much greater experience with wildlife, say it comes down to the bear’s mental or physical health.

“The longer that you keep them in captivity, you obviously increase their body mass and their general physical health, but you also change their behaviour so that they become more accustomed to people,” Minnesota-based wildlife biologist Dave Garshelis told the Winnipeg Sun. “People weigh those two things very differently.”

While it may seem heartless to release these young animals back into the wild, we have to ask what scenario would be worse: life in the wild as nature intended — however short — or a choice between a long life in a zoo behind bars as amusement for the public, or destruction?

Perhaps the biggest lesson here is that the public should leave wildlife well enough alone and let nature take its course.

Republished from the Brandon Sun print edition June 22, 2012

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

“We recognize that when you release a rehabilitated animal, you’re giving it a second chance at being a wild animal, and that’s a successful outcome from a wildlife rehabilitation point of view.”

— Jim Duncan, Manitoba Conservation

Please subscribe to view full article.

Already subscribed? Login to view full article.

Not yet a subscriber? Click Here to Signup

“We recognize that when you release a rehabilitated animal, you’re giving it a second chance at being a wild animal, and that’s a successful outcome from a wildlife rehabilitation point of view.”

— Jim Duncan, Manitoba Conservation

Subscription required to view full article.

A subscription to the Brandon Sun Newspaper is required to view this article. Please update your user information if you are already a newspaper subscriber.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Submit a Random Act of Kindness
Why Not Minot?
Brandon Sun Business Directory
Brandon Sun Twitter