Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Opinion
Classified Sites

Brandon Sun - PRINT EDITION

Many benefits to gas-fired plant

Manitobans should be very pleased at the provincial government’s announcement that it has asked the PUB to conduct a study to tell it whether there is a better alternative to Hydro’s plan to build the proposed northern Keeyask and Conawapa generating stations.

The construction costs of the two dams will exceed $13.4 billion. In fact, many millions of dollars are currently being spent virtually on a daily basis in planning and preparation. The purpose of the expansion is to give Manitoba Hydro additional capacity so that it can export power to the U.S.

However, this no longer appears profitable not only because of the decline in the U.S. economy but also because of a technological break through allowing for the production of huge quantities of cheap shale gas. This has resulted in lowering the market price of electricity in the U.S. below the cost of generating hydro electricity in Northern Manitoba. In effect, selling our high cost Northern power to the Americans is a losing proposition.

A previous PUB Order, No. 5/12, issued on Jan. 7, 2012 and which is available on the PUB website, includes a statement from the chairman at that time urging the government to re-examine the need for new hydro generation. He called for a formal review of Hydro’s development plan urging the government to conduct a NFATA (“needs for and alternatives to”) study.

On page 125 the Chairman notes that a large combined cycle gas-fired plant could be constructed at a fraction of the cost of building Bipole III and provide resource diversity which we do not have. In effect, Bipole III would be unnecessary. In the event that Bipole I and II were out of service the combined cycle gas-fired plant could be used to compensate.

The PUB report also indicated that the deferring or cancelling of Bipole III will benefit Manitoba Hydro consumers with lower rates than we would have otherwise. And of course, the Bipole III environmental problems will cease to exist.

There are other benefits that can result from adding a gas-fired plant to supplement our hydro system. Among them are:

• The lessening of air pollution in this part of the continent since it would eliminate the need to import “dirty” electricity (generated from oil) from the U.S. which occurs in times of drought and in extreme cold periods in winter. Depending on circumstances, such imports can be substantial.

• The improvement in our balance of payments with the U.S. since we would no longer be paying to import electricity.

• The attainment of more security of supply with less dependency on long-distance power lines since the plant would be closer to consumers than a remote hydro dam.

• The creation of jobs to build and then operate the facility resulting in economic stimulus.

The logical place to build the plant is in the populated areas of southern Manitoba. Brandon would probably be the ideal spot where there are support services available. The city’s economy would expand through the construction activities and then the on-going need for workers to operate the plant. However, regardless of the location there would be economic stimulus realized in our province from the establishment of a gas-fired plant.

Len Evans

Brandon

Republished from the Brandon Sun print edition November 28, 2012

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article is currently rated an average of 5 out of 5 (2 votes).
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 1 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Bravo, bravo, bravo!

Common sense SHOULD prevail and Mr. Len Evans is RIGHT on the money regarding this issue.

Mr. Selinger, PLEASE admit that you were wrong and PLEASE listen to the advice of so many others who are giving you cautionary warnings, common sense and educated advice.

IF you cannot admit that you might have made a mistake, then that is pride and the Good Book says that pride goes before a fall.

PLEASE listen to the people of Manitoba on this issue, Mr. Selinger!

IF you do not, not only might you fall personally but you will take the provincial debt of this entire province and all Manitobans with you.

It could take us DECADES to recover from this grave mistake.

Please think about being MORE TRANSPARENT.

IF you TRULY have the VERY BEST interests of this province and it's citizens as your first priority, then please listen to the many Manitobans who are warning you and telling you to PLEASE reconsider and change your mind on this issue.

Premier Selinger, if any one of us were Premier and we repeatedly and consistently REFUSED to heed the clear warnings and advice of SO MANY individuals within our province, then we would be an absolute fool.

PLEASE soften your heart, please LISTEN to the people within your province, and PLEASE change your mind on this issue.

This decision by yourself and by your govt. is going to have a CATACLYSMIC effect on the rest of us within this province.

Please be WISE on this issue and please LISTEN to your elder, Mr. Len Evans.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Manitobans should be very pleased at the provincial government’s announcement that it has asked the PUB to conduct a study to tell it whether there is a better alternative to Hydro’s plan to build the proposed northern Keeyask and Conawapa generating stations.

The construction costs of the two dams will exceed $13.4 billion. In fact, many millions of dollars are currently being spent virtually on a daily basis in planning and preparation. The purpose of the expansion is to give Manitoba Hydro additional capacity so that it can export power to the U.S.

Please subscribe to view full article.

Already subscribed? Login to view full article.

Not yet a subscriber? Click here to sign up

Manitobans should be very pleased at the provincial government’s announcement that it has asked the PUB to conduct a study to tell it whether there is a better alternative to Hydro’s plan to build the proposed northern Keeyask and Conawapa generating stations.

The construction costs of the two dams will exceed $13.4 billion. In fact, many millions of dollars are currently being spent virtually on a daily basis in planning and preparation. The purpose of the expansion is to give Manitoba Hydro additional capacity so that it can export power to the U.S.

Subscription required to view full article.

A subscription to the Brandon Sun Newspaper is required to view this article. Please update your user information if you are already a newspaper subscriber.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
Sudden Surge: Flood of 2014
Opportunity Magazine — The Bakken
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media