Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Court: lawyers for man accused of Chicago bomb attempt will not have access to spy records

FILE - This undated file photo provided by the U.S. Marshal's office shows terrorism suspect Adel Daoud, of Hillside, Ill., a man accused of trying to ignite a bomb in Chicago. On Monday, June 16, 2014, a U.S. appeals court reversed a trial court's ruling that granted Daoud's attorneys unprecedented access to secret intelligence court records. (AP Photo/U.S. Marshal's office, File)

Enlarge Image

FILE - This undated file photo provided by the U.S. Marshal's office shows terrorism suspect Adel Daoud, of Hillside, Ill., a man accused of trying to ignite a bomb in Chicago. On Monday, June 16, 2014, a U.S. appeals court reversed a trial court's ruling that granted Daoud's attorneys unprecedented access to secret intelligence court records. (AP Photo/U.S. Marshal's office, File)

CHICAGO - Attorneys for a 20-year-old accused of trying to ignite a bomb in downtown Chicago won't be granted what would have been unprecedented access to secret intelligence-court records, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday, reversing a trial court and handing a major victory to the government.

A three-judge panel issued its opinion just days after oral arguments in a terrorism case that touched on issues raised by Edward Snowden. Revelations by the former government contractor about expanded U.S. phone and Internet spying and how the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or FISA court, secretly signed off on them raised a furor over the practices.

In its Monday opinion, the appellate court agreed with prosecutors, who argued that letting Adel Daoud's lawyers see the FISA court records — submitted as part of a warrant application — would endanger national security.

"Our own study of the classified material has convinced us that there are indeed compelling reasons of national security for (the records) being classified," Judge Richard Posner wrote in the court's opinion. The court was submitting a sealed, classified opinion along with the public one to explain further, he added.

Daoud, a U.S citizen, has denied allegations he accepted a phoney car bomb from undercover FBI agents, parked it by a Chicago bar and pressed a trigger. His trial is scheduled to start Nov. 10.

Defence attorney Thomas Durkin has said Daoud was working on a term paper about Osama bin Laden around 2012. The FISA records he wants to see, he's said, could shed light on whether investigators flagged Daoud because of Internet searches regarding bin Laden.

But the risk, Posner wrote, wasn't so much that Daoud's attorneys could disclose national secrets contained in the FISA records intentionally.

"Though it is certainly highly unlikely that Daoud's lawyers would, Snowden-like, publicize classified information in violation of federal law, they might in their zeal to defend their client ... or misremembering what is classified and what not, inadvertently say things that would provide clues to classified material," he said.

Since Congress created the FISA court in 1978, no defence attorneys had been told they could go through a FISA application — until Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman's January 29 ruling in Daoud's case.

Among Judge Coleman's errors, Posner wrote, was her finding that allowing defence attorneys access to the FISA documents would help her thrash out what secret-court material was and wasn't relevant to the case.

"The judge appears to have believed that adversary procedure is always essential to resolve contested issues, of fact," he wrote. "Not only is federal judicial procedure not always adversarial — it is not always fully open."

As an example, he noted that companies' trade secrets are frequently concealed in judicial proceedings.

Later on Monday, Durkin said he strongly disagreed.

"The adversary system is the foundation of civil liberties in this country and this opinion drives another significant wedge into that time-honoured process...." he said.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Brandon Sun Business Directory
Sudden Surge: Flood of 2014
Opportunity Magazine — The Bakken
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media