Accessibility/Mobile Features
Skip Navigation
Skip to Content
Editorial News
Classified Sites

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

US appeals court rules gay marriage bans in Wisconsin, Indiana are unconstitutional

Katy Heyning, left, and Judi Trampf, right, plaintiffs in Wolf v. Walker, speak during a press conference at Plan B in Madison, Wis., Thursday, Sept. 4, 2014. Earlier in the day, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago struck down the gay marriage bans of Wisconsin and Indiana as unconstitutional. (AP Photo/Wisconsin State Journal, M.P. King)

Enlarge Image

Katy Heyning, left, and Judi Trampf, right, plaintiffs in Wolf v. Walker, speak during a press conference at Plan B in Madison, Wis., Thursday, Sept. 4, 2014. Earlier in the day, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago struck down the gay marriage bans of Wisconsin and Indiana as unconstitutional. (AP Photo/Wisconsin State Journal, M.P. King)

CHICAGO - An appeals court declared that gay marriage bans in Wisconsin and Indiana violated the U.S. Constitution, on the same day that 32 states asked the Supreme Court to settle the issue once and for all.

The scathing, unanimous decision by a three-judge panel blasted the argument that only matrimony between a man and a woman should be allowed because it is — simply — tradition.

It also criticized another argument from the states that gays should not be allowed to marry because, on their own, they can't procreate, saying that rationale "is so full of holes that it cannot be taken seriously."

There are "bad traditions that are historical realities such as cannibalism, foot-binding, and suttee," says the ruling of the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago. "Tradition per se therefore cannot be a lawful ground for discrimination — regardless of the age of the tradition."

Wisconsin Attorney General J.B Van Hollen said he would appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Also Thursday, Massachusetts and 14 other states where same-sex marriage is legal filed a brief asking the justices to overturn other states' bans on gay marriage.

Meanwhile, Colorado and 16 other states that have banned same-sex marriage filed a separate brief asking the court to rule one way or the other to clear up a "morass" of lawsuits.

Same-sex marriage is legal in 19 states and Washington, D.C. Bans that have been overturned in some other states continue to make their way through the courts. Since last year, the vast majority of federal rulings have declared same-sex marriage bans unconstitutional.

"Homosexuals are among the most stigmatized, misunderstood, and discriminated-against minorities in the history of the world," the 7th Circuit ruling says.

The opinion repeatedly mentions the issue of tradition, noting that some, such as shaking hands, may "seem silly" but "are at least harmless." That's not the case with gay-marriage bans, the court said.

A constitutional amendment approved in 2006 by voters banned gay marriage in Wisconsin, while state law prohibited it in Indiana.

The court's decision won't take effect for at least 21 days, said Camilla Taylor, a lawyer for Lambda Legal who argued on behalf of Wisconsin plaintiffs. That should give the states time to ask the Supreme Court to put it on hold, she said.

The decision came unusually fast for the 7th Circuit — just nine days after oral arguments — suggesting unanimity came easily to the panel. The court's decisions typically take months. One of the three judges was appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, while the other two were appointed by Democratic Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.

One outstanding question is whether the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on gay marriage.

Supreme Court justices typically take up issues only when lower courts disagree. But in this case, even victors in the lower courts may want the high court to address the question — to settle the issue once and for all across the U.S.

___

Follow Michael Tarm on Twitter at http://twitter.com/mtarm

___

Associated Press reporters Todd Richmond and Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin; Tom LoBianco in Indianapolis; and Mark Sherman in Washington, D.C., also contributed to this report.

  • Rate this Rate This Star Icon
  • This article has not yet been rated.
  • We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

    You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

    Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

Sort by: Newest to Oldest | Oldest to Newest | Most Popular 0 Commentscomment icon

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Commentcomment icon

Comment
  • You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Election 2014
Brandon Sun Business Directory
The First World War at 100
Why Not Minot?
Welcome to Winnipeg

Social Media