Wheat board headed to highest court?
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!
As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.
Now, more than ever, we need your support.
Starting at $15.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.
Subscribe Nowor call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.
Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Brandon Sun access to your Free Press subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $20.00 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.00 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 27/07/2012 (4980 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
The dispute over whether the Harper government broke the law last fall when it introduced legislation to rid the Canadian Wheat Board of its monopoly powers may wind up before Canada’s highest court.
Eight former wheat board directors and the farm group Friends of the Canadian Wheat Board said Thursday they will seek leave to appear before the Supreme Court of Canada. They will argue Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz was required to hold a vote of Prairie farmers before he introduced his controversial wheat board bill.
On Dec. 6, wheat board supporters rejoiced when Federal Court Justice Douglas Campbell ruled Ritz had failed to comply with his statutory duty under the Canadian Wheat Board Act when he tabled the Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act in the House of Commons.
The ruling, however, didn’t affect the government’s ability to pass its legislation. And a subsequent challenge to the new law at Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench was also unsuccessful.
Meanwhile, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned Campbell’s decision earlier this year, setting up the high court challenge.
“We believe that this case raises issues that are important to all Canadians and is worthy of careful consideration by the Supreme Court of Canada,” said Allen Oberg, a farmer and former wheat board chairman.
Under the new legislation, Prairie farmers will no longer be required to market wheat and barley used for human consumption or destined for export markets through the Canadian Wheat Board. The legislation takes effect Aug. 1.
Oberg and others believe the changes mean Prairie farmers will now take home less money than they would have at a time when world grain prices are rising.
Opponents of the new federal law argue Section 41 of the old Canadian Wheat Board Act prevented any government from ending the wheat board of its monopoly without a farm vote.
“This case is bigger than farm policy and has important implications for all Canadians because it raises fundamental questions about whether government is above the law,” said Stewart Wells, chairman of the Friends group.