Private marketing of grain failed our farmers in past
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!
As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.
Now, more than ever, we need your support.
Starting at $15.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.
Subscribe Nowor call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.
Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Brandon Sun access to your Free Press subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on brandonsun.com
- Read the Brandon Sun E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
*Your next Free Press subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $20.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 01/08/2012 (5078 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Mr. Ritz and Mr. Harper want to tell farmers that they have installed a new grain marketing future after Aug. 1 when the Canadian Wheat Board’s single desk selling is eliminated.
Wrong! The old private marketing structure that failed our farmers in the past has just been resurrected.
Skilled selling, done through the farmer-controlled CWB single desk and which the majority of farmers support, is being replaced with deliberate confusion through private pricing causing farmers the hardship of knowing when to sell and when to hold.
This old market structure system is run in the interests of the grain buyers. Buyers can now bestow cheaper prices upon farmers by fiddling with the delivery time, place and with the quality offers (basis), thus paying a lower overall price for grain. Grain companies are in control of the quality bids and thus expect, gleefully, to capture more profit.
If grain is in short supply, then the price would be up. But when there is an abundant supply and even if the farmers have not yet sold any grain, the price would be down because the buyers will say there is lots of grain around. Just listen to the trade. They talk as if they own the crop based on what they think is being produced, as if they can say for sure that it will all be harvested.
Already, Canada’s customers are worried about the quality and timely delivery of our grain. But they are happy that they might be able to find lower prices by talking to different suppliers. So what message does this signal to farmers about our farm income, Mr Ritz?
Farmers are asking themselves, what did I do last election to deserve such an unscientific casino marketing headache from this government?
Farmers are good at reading signals, and they say bring back the value of our CWB either by court order recovery of the CWB or by reinstatement of the CWB.
IAN L. ROBSON
Deleau