Judicial review request challenges denial of Corb Lund’s anti-coal petition
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!
As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.
Now, more than ever, we need your support.
Starting at $15.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.
Subscribe Nowor call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.
Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Brandon Sun access to your Free Press subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on brandonsun.com
- Read the Brandon Sun E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
*Your next Free Press subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $20.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
EDMONTON – Organizers of a petition to ban new coal mining on the eastern slopes of the Rockies have filed for a judicial review, challenging Elections Alberta’s decision that the petition failed.
Earlier this month, the agency announced that the anti-coal petition led by country singer Corb Lund didn’t gain enough verified signatures to move it forward.
At the time, Lund said roughly 35,000 signatures for the petition were rejected by Elections Alberta and that he had grave concerns about the fairness of the process.
The Water Not Coal petition drive needed almost 178,000 signatures to force Premier Danielle Smith’s government to consider passing a law banning new coal mining or sending it to a provincewide referendum.
In June, Lund delivered what he said were more than enough names to force the issue.
The review application to Alberta’s Court of King’s Bench argues the decision was unreasonable, procedurally unfair and inconsistent with the purpose of the Citizen Initiative Act.
Lund says in a statement that more than 200,000 Albertans signed the petition in good faith and they deserve a fair and reasonable process.
“We believe Elections Alberta applied standards that were stricter than the law requires, and that thousands of Albertans were effectively shut out by verification processes that don’t make sense,” he said in the statement Thursday.
“This judicial review is about ensuring that citizens’ voices weren’t lost in technicalities.”
The elections agency said when it did random checks on the authenticity of names, statistical sampling led them to estimate 172,000 were verified, causing the petition to fail.
The judicial review request is asking the court to set aside the decision, declare the petition successful or return the matter to Elections Alberta for reconsideration.
Elections Alberta has said its verification process was rigorous and cited unconfirmed voter information as reasons for rejecting signatures.
The agency was not immediately available Thursday for comment.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2026.