Senate bill sets guidelines for use of notwithstanding clause in federal laws
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!
As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.
Now, more than ever, we need your support.
Starting at $15.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.
Subscribe Nowor call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.
Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Brandon Sun access to your Free Press subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $20.00 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.00 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
MONTREAL – A bill introduced in the Senate seeks to set rules on how the federal government can adopt laws that override certain parts of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Sen. Peter Harder’s bill would amend the Canadian Constitution Act and create a framework for how Ottawa can use Section 33, the so-called notwithstanding clause, which shields legislation from some Charter challenges.
The bill would permit legislation that invokes the notwithstanding clause to be introduced in Parliament only after the Supreme Court has declared that the proposed law violates one or more Charter rights.
Harder’s bill, tabled earlier this year, would also require the minister who introduces legislation invoking the notwithstanding clause to include a justification for its use.
As well, any bill with Section 33 would need to be passed by a two-thirds majority in the House of Commons and with the support of at least two parties.
Harder told a news conference he hopes the bill can provide a template for other jurisdictions in Canada on how to use the notwithstanding clause, which is the subject of a pending Supreme Court hearing.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 20, 2025.