B.C. Court of Appeal upholds murder conviction for Vancouver Island prison escapee

Advertisement

Advertise with us

VANCOUVER - The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld the first-degree murder conviction of James Busch, who escaped from a Vancouver Island prison in 2019 with another inmate, then killed a man who lived near the institution. 

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!

As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.

Now, more than ever, we need your support.

Starting at $15.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.

Subscribe Now

or call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.

Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Brandon Sun access to your Free Press subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on brandonsun.com
  • Read the Brandon Sun E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
Start now

No thanks

*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $20.00 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.00 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 11/04/2025 (197 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

VANCOUVER – The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld the first-degree murder conviction of James Busch, who escaped from a Vancouver Island prison in 2019 with another inmate, then killed a man who lived near the institution. 

Busch claimed on appeal that the trial judge didn’t properly instruct the jury involving a “narrow” issue, focusing on “his potential liability for aiding a planned and deliberate first-degree murder.”

Canadian law allows for murder charges to be elevated to first-degree, even if killings are unplanned, when coupled with other offences such as unlawful confinement, which was at issue in the death of Martin Payne, 60. 

Defence lawyer Ervin Ariaee said Friday that Busch was seeking a new trial, believing that his conviction as an “aider” to a constructive first-degree murder was “improper.” 

“We’re very seriously considering seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada and we’re taking the first steps to try and get that process started,” Ariaee said. 

Busch and fellow inmate Zachary Armitage escaped from William Head Institution, a minimum security prison near Victoria, on July 7, 2019, and Payne was murdered in his home the next day. 

The Appeal Court ruling says Payne was found dead on his bathroom floor days later “in a pool of blood, with duct tape on his leg and arm.” 

Armitage and Busch stole a truck after their escape, and the ruling says the vehicle’s owner noticed that a knife, a backpack and jacket were missing upon its return, which police located while investigating Payne’s murder. 

Police found evidence on Payne’s home computer that someone had searched several terms on Google while Payne was at work on July 8, including “William Head Institution,” “private water taxi, Victoria B.C.,” and “Zachary Armitage.” 

Phone records from Payne’s landline included calls to Armitage’s friends, and a recorded call to a Victoria water taxi company, and a corrections officer recognized Armitage’s voice on the recording. 

Payne died from “multiple sharp wounds” to his head and neck, and Busch was arrested wearing a hat and backpack owned by the victim, while Armitage was wearing Payne’s boots. 

Police also found other evidence, including bloody clothing with Busch’s DNA in garbage bags in Payne’s bedroom. 

Armitage pleaded guilty to the killing, but Busch continued on with a trial that focused on whether he was involved in the murder to some degree, “if at all.” 

A jury found him guilty of first-degree murder in 2022, but he appealed the conviction claiming the lower court judge gave improper instructions to the jury. 

The three-judge panel dismissed the appeal Friday, finding the judge gave “well-structured and organized” jury instructions that boiled down complex legal concepts to be “easily understood,” rejecting Busch’s appeal that focused on “one narrow area” of jury instructions. 

Ariaee said he couldn’t comment on his client’s thoughts or feelings about Friday’s ruling, but he said Busch “does maintain his innocence and he does believe that this appeal has merit.”

“When we make appeals on errors in law, it’s very important that these appeals are brought forward because it ensures that the law is properly followed,” he said. “Appeals always have a much broader implication to them and a much broader benefit to society generally.” 

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 11, 2025. 

Report Error Submit a Tip

National

LOAD MORE