B.C. court dismisses challenge to university faculty association’s Gaza resolutions

Advertisement

Advertise with us

VANCOUVER - The B.C. Supreme Court says the Simon Fraser University faculty association did not go beyond its "stated purposes" by passing resolutions condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and calling for the university to divest from arms manufacturers. 

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!

As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.

Now, more than ever, we need your support.

Starting at $15.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.

Subscribe Now

or call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.

Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Brandon Sun access to your Free Press subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on brandonsun.com
  • Read the Brandon Sun E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
Start now

No thanks

*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $20.00 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.00 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 02/09/2025 (205 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

VANCOUVER – The B.C. Supreme Court says the Simon Fraser University faculty association did not go beyond its “stated purposes” by passing resolutions condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza and calling for the university to divest from arms manufacturers. 

The resolutions were adopted by the association last year, but were opposed by a group of members who said that taking stances on such divisive geopolitical issues was inconsistent with the faculty association’s purpose. 

The court ruling released Tuesday says both resolutions had introductions about Israel’s “unrelenting assault” on Gaza, the number of Palestinians killed, and the university’s investments in weapons manufacturers, and were “vigorously debated” by the membership. 

The judgment says the petitioners argued that faculty members were free to advocate political stances on their own, but not through the faculty association because they claimed its actions should be geographically limited to the “university campus or region.” 

The court ruling says the faculty association had passed other political resolutions and gone unchallenged, including a protest against the arrest and torture of a Uruguayan professor, the oppressive regime of Augusto Pinochet in Chile, the abuse of academics in the former Soviet Union, and resolutions about the Trans Mountain pipeline and climate change. 

Justice Francesca Marzari’s ruling says the petitioners failed to convince her that the Gaza and divestment resolutions were improper because the stated purposes of the university’s faculty association are “worded broadly and without the limitations asserted” by the dissenting faculty members. 

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 2, 2025. 

Report Error Submit a Tip

National

LOAD MORE