Supreme Court cites hearsay evidence in upholding order of new trial in beating death
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!
As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.
Now, more than ever, we need your support.
Starting at $15.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.
Subscribe Nowor call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.
Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Brandon Sun access to your Free Press subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on brandonsun.com
- Read the Brandon Sun E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
*Your next Free Press subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $20.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed the order of a new trial for an Alberta man accused in a beating death.
Joshua Dennehy’s bludgeoned body was discovered late one night in July 2020 in central Alberta.
Dylon Saddleback was arrested and charged with second-degree murder after the victim’s blood was found on his shoes and clothing, as well as an axe.
Dennehy had socialized that evening with Saddleback and a number of others outside a trailer, and at some point everyone but the two men left to attend a nearby birthday party.
The timing of the group’s departure was key to establishing how long the men were the only ones at the trailer.
At trial, Saddleback raised the possibility that sometime after the group left for the party, someone else turned up and killed Dennehy.
Members of the group gave inconsistent evidence about the timing, but said Dennehy was on the phone and Saddleback was in the trailer when they were leaving.
It is clear that between 10 and 10:30 p.m., Dennehy was on the phone with his girlfriend, Delayna Bull, for 10 to 20 minutes.
Bull testified that toward the end of the call, the sound became distorted as if Dennehy had dropped his phone. She later heard shuffling, tussling and repeated thudding.
Saddleback’s counsel asked Bull, on cross-examination, whether Dennehy had told her during the call that “he was being ditched by those guys.” She eventually agreed that Dennehy had used the word “ditched.”
The trial judge convicted Saddleback of second-degree murder, providing brief oral reasons that mentioned Dennehy’s statement about being “ditched.”
A majority of the Court of Appeal allowed Saddleback’s appeal and ordered a new trial on the basis the judge erred in relying on Dennehy’s out-of-court statement.
The Crown then took its case to the Supreme Court.
In its ruling Friday, a majority of the top court said the trial judge used the victim’s statement as hearsay — that is, for proof of the truth of its contents.
Hearsay is generally inadmissible in court, mainly because it is often difficult to assess the truthfulness of the statement in question.
The court agreed that a new trial is needed.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 22, 2026.