Letter to the editor — Province’s arsenic attitude seems strangely cavalier

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Why is the government of Manitoba clinging to its monumentally callous practice of releasing arsenic into the environment?

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

We need your support!
Local journalism needs your support!

As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed.

Now, more than ever, we need your support.

Starting at $4.99/month you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website.

Subscribe Now

or call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527.

Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community!

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 03/12/2013 (3286 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Why is the government of Manitoba clinging to its monumentally callous practice of releasing arsenic into the environment?

After all, the deadly nature of the poison is hardly a deep, dark secret.

Have Premier Greg Selinger and his minister responsible for the environment, Gord Mackintosh, never heard of the Borgias? They’re the infamous Italian family who rose to power in the church, using arsenic to murder people for their money and property. And that was way back in the Middle Ages.

Known even then as “The King of Poisons,” a single dose the size of a pea was said to dispatch a victim with “violent abdominal cramping, diarrhea, vomiting and shock.” Has no one with our provincial government ever read the classic, groundbreaking book, “Silent Spring?” It was written back in the 1960s, but has well stood the test of time. In it, its highly respected author, Rachel Carson, reminded the world that arsenic found in chimney soot in England two centuries before, was carcinogenic. It caused cancer.

Carson wrote further: “Epidemics of chronic arsenical poisoning involving whole populations over long periods are on record. Arsenic-contaminated environments have also caused sickness and death among horses, cows, goats, pigs, deer, fishes and bees.”

Yet the Manitoba government will not budge from its decision to allow the Town of Virden, in the southwest, to release arsenic it has captured from the town’s drinking water supply into Gopher Creek, a tributary of the Assiniboine River. That river, in turn, flows through many communities downstream, including Brandon and Winnipeg.

The government has stubbornly dismissed repeated pleas by a concerned resident of the area, John Fefchak, to find a method of disposal for this “captured” arsenic other than simply dumping it back into the environment. Sadly, his repeated letters to the editor on this issue seem to be falling on deaf ears. The province continues to cling to the outdated notion that the arsenic levels involved are so small, there is no cause for concern — that “the solution to pollution is dilution!”

This assumption is, at best, just plain unscientific.

For example, an American molecular toxicologist, Joshua Hamilton, recently stated that those who ingest only 10 parts per billion over a lifetime, an incredibly tiny amount, “increase their risk of disease substantially.”

And in 2011, a team of American university researchers reported the results of a study of almost 12 thousand men and women in Bangladesh. It found a relationship between arsenic exposure and death from heart disease, “at a much lower level of exposure than previously reported.”

Even Health Canada, not always the staunchest defender of the public health, saw fit to cut back some time ago on the amount of arsenic it allows in drinking water. Meanwhile, Manitoba, by contrast, maintains an attitude respecting this deadly poison that can only be described as strangely cavalier.

Larry Powell

Neepawa

Report Error Submit a Tip

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Letters to the Editor

LOAD MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR